Hi Harald,
On 13.12.22 23:27, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Am 13.12.22 um 22:41 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
Back to differences: 'diff -U0 -p -w' against the last GCC 11 branch
shows:
...
@@ -35,0 +37,2 @@ export_proto(cfi_desc_to_gfc_desc);
+/* NOTE: Since GCC 12, the FE generates code to do the conversio
Hi Tobias,
Am 13.12.22 um 22:41 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
Note: We only talk about those two functions, the other functions are used
by both GCC <= 11 and GCC >= 12.
yes.
Fortunately, these functions matter most as they map GFC internals to CFI
internals or vice versa. Most other functions are
Hi Harald,
On 13.12.22 21:53, Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
I now did so - except for three fixes (cf. changelog). See also
PR: https://gcc.gnu.org/PR108056
There is no testcase as it needs to be compiled by GCC <= 11 and then
run with linking (dynamically) to a GCC 12 or 13 libgfortran
Hi Tobias,
Am 13.12.22 um 17:29 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
This is a 12/13 regression as come changes to fix the GFC/CFI descriptor
that went into GCC 12 fail with the (bogus) descriptor passed via by a
GCC-11-compiled program.
As later GCC 12 changes moved the descriptor to the front end, those
fu
I missed that 'align' needs to be a power of 2 - contrary to 'aligned',
which does not have this restriction for some odd reason.
OK for mainline?
Tobias
-
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftun
This is a 12/13 regression as come changes to fix the GFC/CFI descriptor
that went into GCC 12 fail with the (bogus) descriptor passed via by a
GCC-11-compiled program.
As later GCC 12 changes moved the descriptor to the front end, those
functions are only in libgomp.so to cater for old program.
On 12/13/22 12:10 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
--- snip --
Any thoughts from all?
Hi,
I haven't commented earlier as I haven't been active in GFortran
development for a couple of years (new job, kids, etc. etc.). So don't
take my opinions too seriously.
But in general, yes, I do think IRC is sh
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 5:53 AM Jerry D via Fortran wrote:
> 1. Slack has adopted some limitations on being able to go back and look
> at older posts. Functionally it is quite good and integrates well
> with github.
> 2. I looked at Element and Fractal which use the Matrix protocols.
>
