Hi,
Mikael beat me to a mail saying essentially the same things by
a few minutes, so I'm just adding a few details.
There are two places where inlining can be done:
* In front-end passes where the parsed fortran code is rewritten
before generating the intermediary code for the optimizers. T
Am 03.11.22 um 11:06 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Le 02/11/2022 à 22:19, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
Am 02.11.22 um 18:20 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Unfortunately no, the coarray case works, but the other problem remains.
The type problem is not visible in the definition of S, it is in the
declarat
Hello,
welcome, and thanks for your interest.
Le 03/11/2022 à 11:48, Théo Cavignac via Fortran a écrit :
Hello,
I am currently writing some numerical code in Fortran 2003 and I want
to use the spread intrinsic because having used NumPy heavily for the
past few years, it feels natural to use suc
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 03.11.22 13:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > [...]
> > Otherwise LGTM, assuming it actually works correctly.
> >
> > I don't remember support for non-contiguous copying to/from devices
> > being actually added, [...] And I think it is
On 03.11.22 13:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[...]
Otherwise LGTM, assuming it actually works correctly.
I don't remember support for non-contiguous copying to/from devices
being actually added, [...] And I think it is not ok to copy bytes
that aren't requested to be copied.
I have now removed that
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:46:25PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> OpenMP/Fortran: 'target update' with strides + DT components
>
> OpenMP 5.0 permits to use arrays with strides and derived
> type components for the list items to the 'from'/'to' clauses
> of the 'target update' directive.
>
> gcc/f
Hello,
I am currently writing some numerical code in Fortran 2003 and I want
to use the spread intrinsic because having used NumPy heavily for the
past few years, it feels natural to use such an array primitive.
I naturally wondered what would be the effect on performance and found
this on Stack Ov
Hi!
Let me add back CC: , so that others may comment,
too.
On 2022-11-03T01:37:10+0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 2 November 2022 21:04:56 CET, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/declare-allocatable-1.f90
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,211 @
Le 02/11/2022 à 22:19, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
Am 02.11.22 um 18:20 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Unfortunately no, the coarray case works, but the other problem remains.
The type problem is not visible in the definition of S, it is in the
declaration of S's prototype in P.
S is defined a
