[PATCH, v3] Fortran: detect blanks within literal constants in free-form mode [PR92805]

Hi Mikael, Am 29.07.22 um 22:36 schrieb Mikael Morin: Indeed, I overlooked that, but my opinion remains that we shouldn’t play with fixed vs free form considerations here. So the options I can see are:  - handle the locus in get_kind; we do it a lot already in matching functions, so it wouldn’t

Re: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: detect blanks within literal constants in free-form mode [PR92805]

Le 29/07/2022 à 21:59, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : Am 29.07.22 um 13:11 schrieb Mikael Morin: > and use gfc_next_char instead of gfc_match_char in get_kind. There is one important functionality in gfc_match_char(): it manages the locus.  We would need then to add this explicitly to

Re: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: fix invalid rank error in ASSOCIATED when rank is remapped [PR77652]

Am 28.07.22 um 22:19 schrieb Mikael Morin: Hello, Le 27/07/2022 à 21:45, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : ok, I have thought about your comments in the review process, and played with the Cray compiler.  Attached is a refined version of the patch that now rejects in addition these cases for

[PATCH, v2] Fortran: detect blanks within literal constants in free-form mode [PR92805]

Hi Mikael, Am 29.07.22 um 13:11 schrieb Mikael Morin: Hello, Le 28/07/2022 à 22:11, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : Dear all, in free-form mode, blanks are significant, so they cannot appear in literal constants, especially not before or after the "_" that separates the literal and the ki

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: detect blanks within literal constants in free-form mode [PR92805]

Hello, Le 28/07/2022 à 22:11, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : Dear all, in free-form mode, blanks are significant, so they cannot appear in literal constants, especially not before or after the "_" that separates the literal and the kind specifier. The initial patch from Steve addressed nu

Re: [Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Permit assumed-size arrays in uniform clause

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 11:47:54AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Testcase wise, the run-time testcase libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90 > checks essentially the same, except that it uses an array-descriptor array > (assumed shape) while this testcase uses an assumed-size array. > > I decided f

[Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Permit assumed-size arrays in uniform clause

Testcase wise, the run-time testcase libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90 checks essentially the same, except that it uses an array-descriptor array (assumed shape) while this testcase uses an assumed-size array. I decided for an extra compile-time only testcase, but it could be also be moved to