Is there anything more required?
On 22-05-03 12:33:43, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Here are gmake check-gfortran results requested by FX.
>
> Before patching:
> === gfortran Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes65106
> # of unexpected failures6
> # of expected failure
Dear all,
I intend to commit the attached patch as obvious within the next
24 hours unless there are objections. It fixes the logic which
is intended to prevent a NULL pointer dereference on invalid
code, which is related to PR104849. (Both PRs by Gerhard).
Co-authored by Steve. Regtested on x
Le 09/05/2022 à 22:20, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
Dear Fortranners,
we were lacking checks for arguments of type TEAM_TYPE to some
coarray intrinsics (FORM TEAM, CHANGE TEAM, and SYNC TEAM).
The attached patch adds these, and as a bonus verifies that
TEAM NUMBER is a scalar integer.
Re
Hi!
On 2022-04-20T15:19:38+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> For
>omp parallel shared(array_desc_var)
> the shared-variable is passed to the generated function as
> argument - and replaced by a DECL_VALUE_EXPR inside the parallel region.
>
> If inside the parallel region, a
>
>omp target data
Le 09/05/2022 à 21:34, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
Am 09.05.22 um 20:24 schrieb Mikael Morin:
The fix itself looks good. Regarding the test, I don’t understand the
problem. Can’t there be multiple subroutines, each having one (or more)
problematic statement(s)?
that's why I tried but
