On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:36:37PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > So, it seems that at some point in the past, the option
> > -fmax-stack-var-size was expanded to allow the placement
> > of an allocatable array into static memory. This has
> > a possibly unintended consequence in t
Hi Steve,
So, it seems that at some point in the past, the option
-fmax-stack-var-size was expanded to allow the placement
of an allocatable array into static memory. This has
a possibly unintended consequence in that automatic
deallocation of an allocatable array does not (or can
not) occur.
So, it seems that at some point in the past, the option
-fmax-stack-var-size was expanded to allow the placement
of an allocatable array into static memory. This has
a possibly unintended consequence in that automatic
deallocation of an allocatable array does not (or can
not) occur.
program foo
