Dear Fortranners,
compiling with -fsanitize=undefined shows that we did mishandle the
case where a missing optional argument is passed to another procedure.
Besides the example given in the PR, the existing testcase
fortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90 fails with:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/m
Hello,
the attached patch is a fix for PR104228.
Even if simple, I wouldn’t call it obvious, as it’s involving character
length and associate, so I don’t mind some extra review eyes.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for master/11/10/9?From 0819226560387b2953622ee3d5d051a35606d504 Mon Sep 17 0
Hello David,
> On 29 Jan 2022, at 11:14, dmainprice via Fortran wrote:
> gfortran run on 64bit Mac ?
Yes, gfortran has been running on (x86_64) 64bit Mac since macOS 10.6.
> Any suggestions will F77 code run ?
if it will compile with gfortran, then you could expect it to run,
cheers
Iain
>
Hello every one,
gfortran run on 64bit Mac ?
Any suggestions will F77 code run ?
all the best and happy year
David Mainprice
