Please confirm your subscription

 

[PATCH, committed] PR fortran/103717 - ICE in doloop_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2656

Dear all, the attached patch fixes an obvious NULL pointer dereference. Committed as obvious after regtesting on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Will "backport" to 11-branch after waiting a few days unless someone protests. Thanks, Harald From ca39102e10643a6b3f07d06934cc0907ba83d9ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/103718 & PR fortran/103719 - [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code

Hi Harald, there are several pretty obvious NULL pointer dereferences on valid and invalid code when checking do-loop contained stuff. Reported by Gerhard. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline/11-branch? OK for both. Thanks for cleaning this up! Regards Thomas

[PATCH] PR fortran/103718 & PR fortran/103719 - [11/12 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code

Dear all, there are several pretty obvious NULL pointer dereferences on valid and invalid code when checking do-loop contained stuff. Reported by Gerhard. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline/11-branch? Thanks, Harald From 89bf4b17022890b539cd4b5dbe9bd9142ff8706c Mon Sep 17 00:00:

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/91497 -- Silence conversion warnings for MIN1 and MAX1

On 12/14/21 01:22, Manfred Schwarb wrote: Am 13.12.21 um 13:29 schrieb Martin Liška: On 12/13/21 12:18, Manfred Schwarb via Fortran wrote: could you commit it for me? I do not have commit access. I can definitely do that, but please attach the patches as output of git format-patch so that gi

Re: [PATCH, v2] PR libfortran/103634 - Runtime crash with PACK on zero-sized arrays

Le 13/12/2021 à 21:27, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : Works better with patch attached... Am 13.12.21 um 21:25 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches: The code is so similar (for good reason) that it makes sense to keep it synchronous.  I added code for 'zero_sized' array with the minor di