Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Add testcase for PR100906

Hi Sandra, PR100906 ("Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1") has been fixed by Tobias's rewrite of the GFC <-> C descriptor conversions.  I'd like to add José's testcase for that issue before closing it.  OK? OK. I think adding undisputed passing test cases from PRs for somethin

[PATCH, Fortran] Add testcase for PR100906

PR100906 ("Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1") has been fixed by Tobias's rewrite of the GFC <-> C descriptor conversions. I'd like to add José's testcase for that issue before closing it. OK? -Sandra commit 4c2fa9cf74162015710ccfd913c827779151aa52 Author: Sandra Loosemore Date

Re: [wwwdocs, committed] GCC 12: Add release note for Fortran TS29113 improvements

Hi Sandra, I've checked in the attached patch to announce the cleanup project that Tobias and I have been working on over the last several months in the GCC 12 release notes.  I also updated the page for TS29113 on the GCC wiki to reflect that anything that still doesn't work ought to be cons

[wwwdocs, committed] GCC 12: Add release note for Fortran TS29113 improvements

I've checked in the attached patch to announce the cleanup project that Tobias and I have been working on over the last several months in the GCC 12 release notes. I also updated the page for TS29113 on the GCC wiki to reflect that anything that still doesn't work ought to be considered a bug,

Re: [PATCH, v2, OpenMP 5.2, Fortran] Strictly-structured block support for OpenMP directives

On 2021/10/21 12:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: +program main + integer :: x, i, n + + !$omp parallel + block +x = x + 1 + end block I'd prefer not to use those x = j or x = x + 1 etc. as statements that do random work here whenever possible. While those are dg-do compile testcases, espec