Re: [Patch] Fortran: Various CLASS + assumed-rank fixed [PR102541]

2021-10-11 Thread Harald Anlauf via Fortran
Hi Tobias, Am 01.10.21 um 02:43 schrieb Tobias Burnus: Hi all, this patch fixes a bunch of issues with CLASS.  * * * besides my previous minor remarks I do not have further comments. I played around a little but did not find any (new) obstacles. OK for mainline? OK from my side. Thanks

PING**2 - (Re: [Patch] Fortran: Various CLASS + assumed-rank fixed [PR102541])

2021-10-11 Thread Tobias Burnus
PING**2 On 06.10.21 12:24, Tobias Burnus wrote: Early ping for this patch. I do note that Harald browsed the patch (thanks!) and had two remarks, cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581256.html (I intent to fix the two nits – as mentioned in the reply to Harald's email.)

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-11 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > But many CPUs do not have hardware floating point in any variant, and > their ABIs / calling conventions do not mention floating point at all. > Still, this works with GCC just fine: it passes floats and doubles the > same as 32-bit resp. 64-bit inte

Re: [Patch] Fortran: Various CLASS + assumed-rank fixed [PR102541]

2021-10-11 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Harald, On 10.10.21 21:27, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: just some random remarks from initially browsing your patch. Thanks for browsing the patch :-) - leftover from debugging? Yes. - code that could be shortened/made slightly more readable: ... Is there a reason to not use strcmp (c

Re: [Patch] libgomp: Add tests for omp_atv_serialized and deprecate omp_atv_sequential.

2021-10-11 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: > > > libgomp/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * allocator.c (omp_init_allocator): Replace omp_atv_sequential with > > > omp_atv_serialized. > > > * omp.h.in: Add deprecated flag for omp_atv_sequential. > > > * omp_lib.f9

Re: [Patch] libgomp: Add tests for omp_atv_serialized and deprecate omp_atv_sequential.

2021-10-11 Thread Marcel Vollweiler
Hi Jakub, Am 11.10.2021 um 11:49 schrieb Jakub Jelinek: On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:40:54AM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: libgomp: Add tests for omp_atv_serialized and deprecate omp_atv_sequential. The variable omp_atv_sequential was replaced by omp_atv_serialized in OpenMP 5.1. This was alre

Re: [Patch] libgomp: Add tests for omp_atv_serialized and deprecate omp_atv_sequential.

2021-10-11 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:40:54AM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: > libgomp: Add tests for omp_atv_serialized and deprecate omp_atv_sequential. > > The variable omp_atv_sequential was replaced by omp_atv_serialized in OpenMP > 5.1. This was already implemented by Jakub (C/C++, commit ea82325afec)

[Patch] libgomp: Add tests for omp_atv_serialized and deprecate omp_atv_sequential.

2021-10-11 Thread Marcel Vollweiler
Hi, The variable omp_atv_sequential was replaced by omp_atv_serialized in OpenMP 5.1. This was already implemented by Jakub (C/C++, commit ea82325afec) and Tobias (Fortran, commit fff15bad1ab). This patch adds two tests to check if omp_atv_serialized is available (one test for C/C++ and one for