Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100656 - ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

On 5/26/21 2:04 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear Fortranners, Gerhard found a case where bounds-checking for an optional, allocatable character dummy resulted in an ICE. We'd better not call the presence check on a non-dummy symbol, as this will hit an assert... Regtested on x86_64-pc

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100602 - [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error

On 5/18/21 11:36 AM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: The generation of the new runtime check picked up the wrong attributes in the case of CLASS array arguments. There is related new code in gfc_conv_procedure_call which served as reference for the fix. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK fo

[PATCH] PR fortran/100656 - ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

Dear Fortranners, Gerhard found a case where bounds-checking for an optional, allocatable character dummy resulted in an ICE. We'd better not call the presence check on a non-dummy symbol, as this will hit an assert... Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? And backport to 11? (Th