Quoting David Henningsson :
j...@resonance.org wrote:
Quoting David Henningsson :
Hi,
I've thinking about a change in the PulseAudio driver, changing
bufattr.maxlength from period_bytes to -1. What this means is basically:
if PulseAudio finds out that the specified buffer length (i e latency
j...@resonance.org wrote:
> Quoting David Henningsson :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've thinking about a change in the PulseAudio driver, changing
>> bufattr.maxlength from period_bytes to -1. What this means is basically:
>> if PulseAudio finds out that the specified buffer length (i e latency)
>> can't be s
Quoting Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas :
On Monday, December 28, 2009, David Henningsson wrote:
bigger latency is probably preferable to drop-outs.
What do you think?
I agree. Other drivers' default settings are also too optimist regarding
buffer sizes.
Regards,
Pedro
Yeah, I think FluidSynth co
Quoting David Henningsson :
Hi,
I've thinking about a change in the PulseAudio driver, changing
bufattr.maxlength from period_bytes to -1. What this means is basically:
if PulseAudio finds out that the specified buffer length (i e latency)
can't be satisfied (usually it tries and receives a dro
On Monday, December 28, 2009, David Henningsson wrote:
> bigger latency is probably preferable to drop-outs.
>
> What do you think?
I agree. Other drivers' default settings are also too optimist regarding
buffer sizes.
Regards,
Pedro
___
fluid-dev ma
Hi,
I've thinking about a change in the PulseAudio driver, changing
bufattr.maxlength from period_bytes to -1. What this means is basically:
if PulseAudio finds out that the specified buffer length (i e latency)
can't be satisfied (usually it tries and receives a drop-out), it will
use a bigger la
