On Thursday 21 October 2010, David Henningsson wrote:
> So about the trac tickets, and whether things get picked up or ignored
More comments about the tickets.
* Our Trac reports are currently broken. The report "{1} Active Tickets" omits
all the tickets having the state "None", migrated from t
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:39:49 +1100
Matt Giuca wrote:
> Thanks for that good clarification. I've been confused as to whether
> we were supposed to be using trac or not.
>
> Perhaps we can create some kind of "virtual" sf.net user, that owns
> all new
> > tickets, and has the fluid-dev list regist
Hi David,
as a side question: here, when hitting "Reply" to a list posting, I get the
personal e-mail address of the poster in the address field. Would it be a good
idea, to get the fluid-dev@nongnu.org in that field, instead (I think which
default address shall be used for "Reply to:", can be
Hi David,
As mainly a 'tester' I think that having the bugs go to the Dev list
would be a great idea, we'd also know when our 'testing' experience
will be needed ;)
GrahamG
___
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
Hi David,
Thanks for that good clarification. I've been confused as to whether we were
supposed to be using trac or not.
Perhaps we can create some kind of "virtual" sf.net user, that owns all new
> tickets, and has the fluid-dev list registered as his "home email" so that
> all ticket notificati
So about the trac tickets, and whether things get picked up or ignored
when put there:
First: Up to a week ago, all tickets were assigned to jgreen by default,
and he is currently not active in this project, at least not much. So
one problem was that nobody got a notification when a new ticket
