Re: [fluid-dev] Poly/mono patch - ticket 160

2017-06-02 Thread Ceresa Jean-Jacques
Hi, Marcus,   >I was very happy when you posted that patch and I had a good look through it. >My instrument behaves very similar to a breath controller, so it would >probably benefit a great >deal from the functionality your patch adds to >FluidSynth. >When you implemented all the changes for

Re: [fluid-dev] Move upstream to github

2017-06-02 Thread Tom M.
Ok, since I brought this topic up, I would like to at least do the migration. Element Green: Could you please: - create a new github organization and invite me ( https://github.com/derselbst/) to it, - provide me the SF project export (via https://sourceforge.net/p/ fluidsynth/admin/export) I w

Re: [fluid-dev] Move upstream to github

2017-06-02 Thread Stefan Sauer
On 06/01/2017 09:27 PM, Element Green wrote: > Sounds good to me. I have had very little time for FluidSynth or my > other free software projects and I haven't heard much from other > maintainers as of late, so it seems to make sense to make things > easier for collaboration and contribution. > >

[fluid-dev] Poly/mono patch - ticket 160 (was: Re: New patch: polyphonic key pressure (aftertouch))

2017-06-02 Thread Marcus Weseloh
Hi Jean-Jacques, 2017-05-31 19:08 GMT+02:00 Ceresa Jean-Jacques < jean-jacques.cer...@orange.fr>: > To give an example, this idea has been implemented partialy in a previous > patch called "Poly/mono patch" (Ticket 160). > I was very happy when you posted that patch and I had a good look through