See notes below:
On 25/06/16 11:23, FenderBenders wrote:
I was thinking the initial breath pressure should send a single note on message
,with increased pressure sending higher and higher velocity and volume messages
with no other note on messages except the zero at the end of pressure input.
I was thinking the initial breath pressure should send a single note on message
,with increased pressure sending higher and higher velocity and volume messages
with no other note on messages except the zero at the end of pressure input.
The weirdness the ewi on the first note is baffling but I t
Sounds like you need to also cancel the default velocity-to-attenuation
modulator:
* Source: Note-On Velocity
* Source curve: concave negative unipolar
* Destination: Attenuation (volume envelope)
* Amount Source: 0
-~Chris
On 06/24/2016 05:17 PM, Ben Gonzales wrote:
Hi all.
I implemen
Hi Greg.
On 25/06/16 08:46, FenderBenders wrote:
Ben, I wonder what happens if you cancel out velocity with negative or zero in
modulators and assign breath #2 to velocity and volume. The dynamic in harmonic
content is dependent on velocity on many sound modules but having midi
monitored the
Ben, I wonder what happens if you cancel out velocity with negative or zero in
modulators and assign breath #2 to velocity and volume. The dynamic in harmonic
content is dependent on velocity on many sound modules but having midi
monitored the output of the ewi I noticed the note on message long
Hi all.
I implemented the CC2 modulator in a sax soundfont, and loaded it into
my RPi2 fluidsynth. I set the EWI to CC2 and the velocity setting to
ZERO. This makes the EWI produce "dynamic velocity". What I found was
that I could start a note at low breath pressure, and resulting low
volume,
Hello Chris,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:12 PM, S. Christian Collins <
s_chriscoll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 10:30 AM, Element Green wrote:
>
> Its been a while since I was looking at this. After reading over the
> spec, it sounds like you are correct. This seems contrary to some of
On 06/24/2016 10:30 AM, Element Green wrote:
Its been a while since I was looking at this. After reading over the
spec, it sounds like you are correct. This seems contrary to some of
the behavior I have observed in Swami in particular. So it may be
that there are some implementation issues (ei
Hello Christian,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:24 AM, S. Christian Collins <
s_chriscoll...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 08:28 PM, Element Green wrote:
>
> There are a bunch of default modulators which cause SoundFont instruments
> to respond to some of the defined MIDI controllers as expected
Hi Ben
>I've read the pdf doc and understand a lot of it, but I don't understand the
>need for the "base" channels.
1)"Basic channels" is a MIDI specification.In short this allows to split the
whole set of synthesizer channels in distinct MIDI channels groups.
Each group is composed of continus
On 06/23/2016 08:28 PM, Element Green wrote:
There are a bunch of default modulators which cause SoundFont
instruments to respond to some of the defined MIDI controllers as
expected (volume control, pitch bender, etc). When attempting to
modify one of these, you have to first define a modulator
11 matches
Mail list logo
