Re: [fluid-dev] Attempting a 64-bit Windows build

2011-08-11 Thread Graham Goode
Hi James, I'll be sending the folder to you in a personal mail. This is my build environment: Windows XP 64-bit with VS2008 64-bit GTK+ 2.16.6 bundle (http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win64/gtk+/2.16/gtk+-bundle_2.16.6-20100208_win64.zip) pkg-config 0.23-2 (http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gn

Re: [fluid-dev] Attempting a 64-bit Windows build

2011-08-11 Thread David Henningsson
On 2011-08-11 11:00, Graham Goode wrote: Hi again, Also built 32-bit with the new fluid_winmidi.c and have it successfully working. Kind regards, GrahamG On 8/11/11, Graham Goode wrote: Thanks David, I've successfully compiled and used the resulting release libfluidsynth.dll with jOrgan 64-

Re: [fluid-dev] Attempting a 64-bit Windows build

2011-08-11 Thread Graham Goode
I'd love to test this but as I'm building from a non SVN sourcecode branch I can't use TortoiseSVN to apply a patch and don't (currently) know of any other way to do patches on Windows. And I'm at the office and the firewall won't let me do the SVN check out :( If you can send me the patched f

Re: [fluid-dev] Attempting a 64-bit Windows build

2011-08-11 Thread James Ong
Hi GrahamG, Could you zip me a copy of the source for me to test on VS10 on W7 (64-bit) as well? I can compile tonight, it's 4:30pm here. Thanks. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:18 PM, David Henningsson wrote: > On 2011-08-10 21:47, Graham Goode wrote: > >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Thanks, I exchanged (DWORD

Re: [fluid-dev] Attempting a 64-bit Windows build

2011-08-11 Thread David Henningsson
On 2011-08-10 21:47, Graham Goode wrote: Hi Pedro, Thanks, I exchanged (DWORD) with (DWORD_PTR) and no longer get the error with the new compile. It is late here, so I will do more testing in the morning... GrahamG Hi Graham, Is windows MIDI working successfully is you apply the attached pat

Re: [fluid-dev] SONAME Bump?

2011-08-11 Thread David Henningsson
On 2011-08-06 16:25, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: On Saturday 06 August 2011, David Henningsson wrote: CMake has a libtool alternative as part of its toolchain, and we use it as default. And yes, we provide a numbering scheme equivalent to libtool there. But something happened with the auto-t