Re: [Bulk] Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Jim Henry
This sounds good to me. Jim Henry On 7/16/2010 11:02 AM, Graham Goode wrote: Hi Guys, With Pedro's help I was able to generate an MSVC build system and succesfully build fluidsynth today. So I think that it should be ok to get rid of the winbuild directory so long as there was a small How-To a

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Friday, July 16, 2010, David Henningsson wrote: > So if we were to remove the winbuild directory altogether, is there > anything we would lose? Anything which wouldn't work as good as the > hand-made ones? We need extensive testing, but I believe that nothing would be lost. Regards, Pedro ___

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Sven Meier
So if we were to remove the winbuild directory altogether ... does that sound fair enough to everyone? Yes please, this directory should be removed. Sven On 07/16/2010 07:35 PM, David Henningsson wrote: 2010-07-16 17:29, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev: On Friday, July 16, 2010, Elimar Gre

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Graham Goode
Hi Guys, With Pedro's help I was able to generate an MSVC build system and succesfully build fluidsynth today. So I think that it should be ok to get rid of the winbuild directory so long as there was a small How-To available on how to setup the dependencies. Pedro's mail can be used as a draft fo

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread David Henningsson
2010-07-16 17:29, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev: > On Friday, July 16, 2010, Elimar Green wrote: >> It would be nice to have the MSVC projects working. I have struggled >> in the past to keep this going, despite the fact I don't personally >> use it. Fixing it could be deferred to a later release

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Friday, July 16, 2010, Elimar Green wrote: > It would be nice to have the MSVC projects working.  I have struggled > in the past to keep this going, despite the fact I don't personally > use it.  Fixing it could be deferred to a later release though. I think that I've explained this before, but

Re: [Bulk] Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Jim Henry
I really hope that the issues of the MSVC projects will be fixed and tested before a release. The Miditzer is a pure MSVC project that uses FluidSynth and it has thousands of users. I think FluidSynth would take a major step backward if it dropped support for MSVC even "temporarily." Unfortunat

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth 1.1.2 release planning

2010-07-16 Thread Elimar Green
Hello David and Fluid-Dev list, A FluidSynth release in 1-3 weeks sounds fine to me. Although I have not had a chance to test your latest changes and I'm not sure if I will get the chance, as I'm still traveling about and don't have access to a development system. I had thought I was going to ha