Re: [fluid-dev] Timing revisited

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 15:09 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > What first was a quick fix that took an hour or two to write, expanded > to fix ticket #15, and should also be expanded to fix the sequencer. And > now I'm about to suggest that timing should be a separate > component/subsystem. > > Fir

Re: [fluid-dev] Fluidsynth on 64-bit Linux

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 16:59 -0400, Ebrahim Mayat wrote: > Hello > > To 64-bit Debian users, I am forwarding this message that I received > off-list. It would be appreciated if anybody could assist/test on > 64-bit Linux. > > The latest svn (r168) has a persistent make error, when >

Re: [fluid-dev] Preparing for 1.0.9 release

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
I like your idea of turning your SoundFont into a collaborative project. I've thought about this type of thing before, in regards to creating a SoundFont patch format, using XML which could be used to pass around changes and merge them. libInstPatch already has the begging of serializing SoundFont

Re: [fluid-dev] Preparing for 1.0.9 release

2009-04-19 Thread S. Christian Collins
When I get the time, I intend to turn GeneralUser GS into an open-source project (never created one before, so we'll see how it goes). Right now I'm going through a divorce, so it might be a bit before I get around to it, though. -~Chris Josh Green wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 09:48 -0400,

Re: [fluid-dev] Preparing for 1.0.9 release

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 09:48 -0400, Ebrahim Mayat wrote: > Josh, Pedro and Bernat > > As a service to Linux users, I propose that the 'GeneralUser GS > FluidSynth v1.43.rgd" file written by S Christian Collins be made > available as part of the new release distribution. Configuring > rosegarden wit

Re: [fluid-dev] Patch for fast midi file rendering

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 06:46 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > * fluid_renderer* is another bad name. It is not rendering anything, in the > > sense of translation, like the verb used in "rendering SVG into bitmap > > graphics". The proposed functions are only audio file helpers, because you >

Re: [fluid-dev] Cutoff Frequency Effect

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 07:49 +0200, Graham Goode wrote: > Hi, > Is there a cutoff frequency effect in Fluidsynth like the TVF Cutoff > Frequency effect in Creative Cards where you set up the NRPN > controller with: > 176,99,1 > 176,98,32 > and then send CC 6 to apply the cutoff filter, like so:

Re: [fluid-dev] midi player issues

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 23:07 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > Felix Krause wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using the fluidsynth library (current unstable Mac version from > > fink) and tested the midi file player. It behaves very strange: > > > > - fluid_player_set_loop doesn't seem to have any

Re: [fluid-dev] Fix for problem with CC changes to Bank MSB

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 00:07 +1100, D.Bartolec wrote: > > I've discovered it after playing some MIDI files that would send bank > LSB:0 for drum channel without sending bank MSB at all. > This would cause drum tracks to change to MSB:0 LSB:0. > Here is the fix: > Its likely those MIDI files ar

Re: [fluid-dev] Fix for problem with CC changes to Bank MSB

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 08:08 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > D.Bartolec skrev: > > I've discovered it after playing some MIDI files that would send bank LSB:0 > > for drum channel without sending bank MSB at all. > > This would cause drum tracks to change to MSB:0 LSB:0. > > I've taken a quick

Re: [Fwd: [fluid-dev] Midi standards (was: Fix for problem with CC changes to Bank MSB)]

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 11:14 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > David Henningsson skrev: > > Otherwise I think it makes sense - LSB setting does not affect MSB > > setting, and the other way around. > > > > A question to the audience: Why do we have variables for banknum and > > prognum in fluid_cha

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth sequencer test

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
Hello David, On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 20:55 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev: > > David Henningsson wrote: > >> Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas skrev: > > > It is something that only Josh can > > do, and he is not answering mails right now. > > That is a problem. > By all m

Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
Hello David and Bernat, On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 13:28 +0200, Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote: > David Henningsson escrigué: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524566 > > > > To get back on topic, I'm not demanding that fluidsynth should be more > > Debian-friendly in the future, b

[fluid-dev] My absence and misunderstandings

2009-04-19 Thread Josh Green
Hello FluidSynth list, As I have mentioned a few times before, I've been rather overwhelmed with work and what not as of late. Things have calmed down a bit now and I have more free time. During the last month though, I wasn't able to keep up with FluidSynth email and it began accruing in my inb

Re: [fluid-dev] The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-19 Thread jimmy
> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:25:30 +0200 > From: Bernat Arlandis i Ma??  > Thanks Jimmy for caring about the fate of my efforts. You > might not know > that everything I've done is in the public trac repository > > (http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/browser/branches/2.x), > the changes > I

Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian

2009-04-19 Thread Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
David Henningsson escrigué: Bernat Arlandis i Mañó skrev: That problem is easily fixable by the packager. My first mail asks two questions: 1) Why is VintageDreamsWaves-v2.sf2 distributed with fluidsynth? 2) What is the copyright for example.sf2? The first question is not a packagin

[fluid-dev] Re: The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-19 Thread jimmy
Let me clarify what I think. So Josh has agreed that all the "new features of 1.1.0" will be implemented. Which means those new features will have to be ported to 2.0 (API compatible or not). But let's not create more work this way and then make the folks who adopted these new features (I m

Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian

2009-04-19 Thread Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
David Henningsson escrigué: Bernat Arlandis i Mañó skrev: David Henningsson escrigué: As part of adopting fluidsynth for Debian, I've run into license trouble. You shouldn't package every file in the developers repository, just what is needed and compatible. I recommend you to u

Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian

2009-04-19 Thread David Henningsson
Bernat Arlandis i Mañó skrev: > David Henningsson escrigué: >> As part of adopting fluidsynth for Debian, I've run into license trouble. > You shouldn't package every file in the developers repository, just what > is needed and compatible. I recommend you to use the current package in > debian as a

Re: [fluid-dev] Re: The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-19 Thread Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
Thanks Jimmy for caring about the fate of my efforts. You might not know that everything I've done is in the public trac repository (http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/browser/branches/2.x), the changes I was in the middle of won't get committed since they would break it, and the other things

Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian

2009-04-19 Thread Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
David Henningsson escrigué: As part of adopting fluidsynth for Debian, I've run into license trouble. First, the copyright file for VintageDreamsWaves-v2.sf2 restricts modification, so that sf2 must be removed. Raises the question of what it is doing there anyway? Second, the documentation, i e