Re: [fluid-dev] FS2.0 proposal

2009-03-02 Thread Max Kellermann
On 2009/03/02 21:20, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > His first message had some valid complains, and a false assumption > deduced from the observation that the CLI program doesn't exit when > a MIDI song has finished. I've tried to answer politely pointing to > the mistake, being rewarded with so

Re: [fluid-dev] FS2.0 proposal

2009-03-02 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
Josh Green wrote: > Hello, > > I didn't feel that Max's input was particularly arrogant or disdainful. > It was some strong criticism but it seemed to be rather constructive as > well. There are indeed many shortcomings of FluidSynth and the project > hasn't really been all that active since I too

Re: [fluid-dev] FS2.0 proposal

2009-03-02 Thread Josh Green
Hello, I didn't feel that Max's input was particularly arrogant or disdainful. It was some strong criticism but it seemed to be rather constructive as well. There are indeed many shortcomings of FluidSynth and the project hasn't really been all that active since I took over maintainership of it.

Re: [fluid-dev] FS2.0 proposal

2009-03-02 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
Max Kellermann wrote: > I have not insulted anybody, I have not attacked anybody personally. > Which you did ("spitted some bullshit"). Let's keep this discussion > on a technical level, don't yield to personal criticism. OK. I have been harsh and rude with you. Sorry about that. Please accept my

Re: [fluid-dev] FS2.0 proposal

2009-03-02 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
Josh Green wrote: > Hello Pedro, > > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 22:55 +0100, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > > Anyway, I would like to ask what do you think about a new stable release > > 1.0.9 from trunk, soon. I really like all the new drivers, and also > > interesting bugfixes. I would like to be abl