On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, at 14:41, James Almer wrote:
> freeze, they will skip 5.0 for their upcoming releases, keep using 4.4,
> and that one will therefore become an LTS release by force, like it's
> currently the case with 4.3, 4.1, and 3.2.
Being de-facto maintained long, because of those disbtri
On 6 Oct 2021, at 11:57, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
Should the next release be called "LTS"?
No, we can specify it *as* LTS but it should still have an actual name.
The danger in calling it 'LTS' is that it will then be confusing if we
specify other releases as LTS: do we mean an LTS releas
LTS releases would be a superb option for corporate FFMpeg users.
От: ffmpeg-devel от имени Michael Niedermayer
Отправлено: 6 октября 2021 г. 12:57
Кому: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
Тема: [FFmpeg-devel] next release
External email: Use caution
On 10/6/2021 6:57 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
Should the next release be called "LTS"?
Should the next release be 4.5 or 5.0 ?
5.0. The major bump removed old core API, so it needs to be reflected in
more ways than just soname.
Should it be made in december 2021 ? (as was suggested i
Hello,
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, at 11:57, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Should the next release be called "LTS"?
Yes.
> Should the next release be 4.5 or 5.0 ?
5.0 seeing the major break in API.
> Should it be made in december 2021 ? (as was suggested in jbs release mail)
I still think so. ( :D )
Hi
Should the next release be called "LTS"?
Should the next release be 4.5 or 5.0 ?
Should it be made in december 2021 ? (as was suggested in jbs release mail)
thx
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Does the universe only have a finite lifespan? No, its
