[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread wsbalgotrader--- via ffmpeg-devel
Nobody condoned it, but pointing out how you have had similar posts, and are quick to anger, and jump the gun often, I said it is understandable people thought you were behind it. What I did say is you need to learn to talk in a tone that is better suited to conversations, not accusations and la

[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] sponsors page

2025-10-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
Hi all i was talking with a company, who wants to sponsor FFmpeg they asked if they would be listed in the GitHub readme. I think we should instead add a sponsors.md and link to forgejo of it (forgejo can render .md) or instead put a sponsors.html on our webpage similar to https://www.python.org

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/x86/hevc/idct: Port ff_hevc_idct_4x4_dc_{8,10,12}_mmxext to SSE2 (PR #20788)

2025-10-29 Thread mkver via ffmpeg-devel
PR #20788 opened by mkver URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20788 Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20788.patch Practically no change in benchmarks (and in codesize). hevc_idct_4x4_dc_8_c:7.8 ( 1.00x) hevc_idct_4x4_dc_8_mmxex

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [RFC] libavdevice

2025-10-29 Thread Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-10-29): > 1. merge libavdevice and libavformat Of course we should do that. The split into multiple libraries serves no purpose, it only makes our work more complicated; the benefits people think they get from it either are nonexistent or could be obta

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> > > > And again, the more important aspect here is that Kieran was *asking*, > not > > publishing, what *business*, not person, sits at a given already > published > > The litteral text from kieran was > > "Who does this address belong to?" > and "who" normally implies a person. > > All above sai

[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libavdevice

2025-10-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
Hi all libavdevice uses teh same ABI as libavformat so extending that ABI without major bump leads to problems input devices and input formats use the same struct FFInputFormat now you cant add a new field to that because the old libavdevice would not have it and the newer libavformat would so t

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
Hi Remi On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 11:31:26PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > Le keskiviikkona 29. lokakuuta 2025, 22.38.17 Itä-Euroopan normaaliaika > Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : > > > When did that happen? > > > > Wed, 31 Jan 2024 > > I can't find it any

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread isellthegood--- via ffmpeg-devel
I vote R - Revoke his access, he clearly is not mature enough to handle the internet. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread isellthegood--- via ffmpeg-devel
That's unfortunate, but here we can call you a "motherfer" as much as we want. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread isellthegood--- via ffmpeg-devel
R ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
Le keskiviikkona 29. lokakuuta 2025, 22.38.17 Itä-Euroopan normaaliaika Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : > > When did that happen? > > Wed, 31 Jan 2024 I can't find it any match in the archives. Besides, that was during the previous CC and that CC (of which you were a member and I

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025, 20:39 Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel, < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Remi > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 07:55:09PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont via > ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > > > > > Le 29 octobre 2025 19:09:15 GMT+02:00, Michael Niedermayer via > ffmpeg-devel a écri

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
Hi Remi On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 07:55:09PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > > Le 29 octobre 2025 19:09:15 GMT+02:00, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel > a écrit : > >Does this also apply to the case where kieran doxxed thilo ? > > When did that happen? Wed, 31 Jan

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
Le 29 octobre 2025 19:09:15 GMT+02:00, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : >Does this also apply to the case where kieran doxxed thilo ? When did that happen? Doxxing is the publication of personal info against that person's will - not quoting some already public info. I seem to re

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

2025-10-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
Hi On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:48:24AM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > Hello all, > > It has come to the attention of the FFmpeg Community Council that the owner > of the YouTube channel @t3dotgg is being "doxxed". In consideration of the > timeline, this is suspected to be

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
Le 29 octobre 2025 17:33:12 GMT+02:00, worldofmaps--- via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : >Since the current FFMPEG twitter account has a lot of engagement and has been >found funny by a lot, the project should probably have two ffmpeg account. One >corporate and one with a title like FFPMEG Official

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
worldofmaps--- via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-10-29): > Since the current FFMPEG twitter account has a lot of engagement and > has been found funny by a lot, the project should probably have two > ffmpeg account. One corporate and one with a title like FFPMEG > Official Satire account or something to th

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/vc1_parser: stop splitting ENDOFSEQ markers into separate packets (PR #20787)

2025-10-29 Thread James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
PR #20787 opened by James Almer (jamrial) URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20787 Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20787.patch Supersedes #20781 >From fd3d41c721b50962cb29c9c409904981c82bd2cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Almer Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread worldofmaps--- via ffmpeg-devel
Since the current FFMPEG twitter account has a lot of engagement and has been found funny by a lot, the project should probably have two ffmpeg account. One corporate and one with a title like FFPMEG Official Satire account or something to this extent. This would make clear that one of the accou

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation

2025-10-29 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
Hello, Le 28 octobre 2025 21:27:23 GMT+02:00, wsbalgotrader--- via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : >Possibly because you have an extensive history with demeaning, rude, and >antagonistic replies (as even proven in this thread). Maybe learn polite >communication tactics, and people won't assign the blam

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/vc1dec: Don't initialize write-only intra_scantable, deduplicate cleanup code (PR #20786)

2025-10-29 Thread mkver via ffmpeg-devel
PR #20786 opened by mkver URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20786 Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20786.patch >From 798a62cbb30586d704d9365cbf87b04cd64b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Rheinhardt Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 15:47:47 +0100 Subject: [PAT

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/x86/qpel: Add specializations for put_l2 functions (PR #20785)

2025-10-29 Thread mkver via ffmpeg-devel
PR #20785 opened by mkver URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20785 Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20785.patch >From 995bc3690264ac6711d8364156fbfcf5b40766e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Rheinhardt Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 03:57:33 +0200 Subject: [PATC

[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding ARM64EC support to FFmpeg

2025-10-29 Thread harish.rajaselvan--- via ffmpeg-devel
Hi Martin, Yes, these were the only patches required for this build mode. There are no further pending changes from my side. These changes don’t affect other builds and are only meant to enable successful compilation in ARM64EC mode for users who wish to build FFmpeg in this configuration. R