PR #20560 opened by michaelni
URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20560
Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20560.patch
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
>From 798c4c50d53a01eb24f172575869738c9e26d93c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Niedermayer
Date: Sat
libavformat/udp.c:283:9: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
Signed-off-by: Brad Smith
---
libavformat/udp.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/udp.c b/libavformat/udp.c
index e1dec49010..27b0147252 100644
--- a/libavformat/udp.c
+++ b/
PR #20557 opened by frankplow
URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20557
Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20557.patch
This loosens the coupling between CBS and the decoder by no longer using
`CodedBitstreamH266Context` (containing the most recently parsed PSs & P
PR #20556 opened by mkver
URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20556
Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20556.patch
Also a bit mccdec.
>From 8e4cbb053bd2dd9c345701e940e5ff4ec2eca766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Rheinhardt
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 19:42:24
PR #20555 opened by Marton Balint (cus)
URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20555
Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20555.patch
This removes lots of parsing code duplications, unifies parsing rules and also
enhances the documentation.
Some notable changes, some
PR #20552 opened by ArazIusubov
URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20552
Patch URL: https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20552.patch
Implement AV1 hardware encoding using Direct3D 12 Video API (D3D12VA).
D3D12 AV1 headers are available starting with Windows SDK 10.0.26100,
so
The first UL of the SMPTE 436M descriptor triple in mxfenc.c used 0x0a
instead of 0x09. This caused generated MXF files without "MXF-GC Generic
ANC
Data Mapping" essence container descriptor.
This patch corrects the UL to align with SMPTE RP224, so that the ANC
descriptor is properly recognized.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:49:00AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested
> Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it)
> heres the "after testing" discussion and v