Hey,
On 04/17/2014 04:40 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
At the end of the day, more talks for more days seems like a better
overall solution, and people are welcome to consider it a 3-days
conference if they feel so. Consider that the submissions far exceed
even the current schedule, so it’s not like
On 23.04.2014 16:20, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> I would also account for the fact that almost 900 people joined
>> EuroPython in Florence last year, with more than a 2x boost in 3
>> years, and the general feedback has been overwhelming positive.
>
> It's possible that the longer conference account
In a message of Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:13:56 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" writes:
>We should probably put the question of which format is preferred
>on the conference feedback form and then see whether a change would
>be worthwhile to improve the attendee experience.
You have to be careful with
We all have ideas about what is good. bottom line: it's complicated.
There are no unit tests, just personal judgment.
Some group of people plan and run an event = good.
To this year's team, and really all PyCon's I have been aware of, keep up
the good work. I am not aware of any event that shou