On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:34:46 -0700 Andrew Sackville-West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Wow. two days on the list and look what I've done.
>
> sorry 'bout that.
>
> These lists operate on a bit of a social contract. We all pitch in and
> help where we can in exchange for a flood of information
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:22:38 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thursday, 07 July 2005, at 09:04:11 (+0200),
> Christoph Gysin wrote:
>
> > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >
> > This is stupid.
>
> No it isn't. Just because you don't understand it or agr
Wow. two days on the list and look what I've done.
sorry 'bout that.
These lists operate on a bit of a social contract. We all pitch in and
help where we can in exchange for a flood of information that may or may
not be useful. That's the deal. I noticed a bunch of off-list replies to
my firs
On Thursday, 07 July 2005, at 13:50:55 (+0200),
Christoph Gysin wrote:
> Please don't quote me out of context.
I didn't. I removed nothing whatsoever between the URL and your
statement, and what came after your statement didn't in any way change
that you said the document was stupid.
> > No it
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 07 July 2005, at 09:04:11 (+0200),
> Christoph Gysin wrote:
>
>>>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>
>>This is stupid.
Please don't quote me out of context.
> No it isn't. Just because you don't understand it or agree with it
> doesn't make i
On Thursday, 07 July 2005, at 09:04:11 (+0200),
Christoph Gysin wrote:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> This is stupid.
No it isn't. Just because you don't understand it or agree with it
doesn't make it stupid. In fact, the guy is right. Unfortunately,
raster is also rig
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:54:45 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:22:35 +0200 Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > This leads to a question about the operation of this list. I had
> > > MANY of
Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> Before doing that I would suggest reading:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
This is stupid. Conversations should take place on the list, so everyone
can benefit from questions of other users. Adding a Reply-To will
increase on-list discussions.
If yo
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:39:12 +0200 "Peter Kjellerstedt"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Before doing that I would suggest reading:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> You are taking away our freedom...
that freedom has been taken away fro years on enlightenment-devel. to this d
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:22:35 +0200 Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > This leads to a question about the operation of this list. I had MANY
> > off list responses. Is that the standard here? and if so, should there
> > be a summary posting at the end of
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> I know some of the mail clients can set reply defaults for different
> address or different folders...
I think you will agree that this is not a solution.
Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know some of the mail clients can set reply defaults for different
address or different folders...
A
Christoph Gysin wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
This leads to a question about the operation of this list. I had MANY
off list responses. Is that the standard here? and if so, should th
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> This leads to a question about the operation of this list. I had MANY
> off list responses. Is that the standard here? and if so, should there
> be a summary posting at the end of discussion? My experience on other
> lists is that we try to get every response into the
13 matches
Mail list logo
