Re: [e-users] Exebuf does not work with E17 0.17.1 and EFL 1.7.5

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:12:51 +0800, you wrote: >On 02/24/2013 06:43 PM, Stefano wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have E17 0.17.1 with EFL 1.7.5 and the exbuf plugin in everything does not >> work. >> >> When I type a command, I am only offered the text option and not to execute >> it. >> >> Exebuf used to wor

Re: [e-users] Exebuf does not work with E17 0.17.1 and EFL 1.7.5

On 02/24/2013 06:43 PM, Stefano wrote: > Hi, > > I have E17 0.17.1 with EFL 1.7.5 and the exbuf plugin in everything does not > work. > > When I type a command, I am only offered the text option and not to execute > it. > > Exebuf used to work with EFL 1.7.0. > > What am I missing? > > Thanks, It

[e-users] Exebuf does not work with E17 0.17.1 and EFL 1.7.5

Hi, I have E17 0.17.1 with EFL 1.7.5 and the exbuf plugin in everything does not work. When I type a command, I am only offered the text option and not to execute it. Exebuf used to work with EFL 1.7.0. What am I missing? Thanks, -- Stefano Fortune of the day: "It is so very hard to be an o

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Andreas Volz wrote: > Am Wed, 5 Dec 2012 07:49:26 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > >> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:46:20 +0100 thomasg >> said: >> >> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:08:44

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 20:05:29 +0100 Andreas Volz said: > Am Wed, 5 Dec 2012 07:49:26 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:46:20 +0100 thomasg > > said: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

Am Wed, 5 Dec 2012 07:49:26 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:46:20 +0100 thomasg > said: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:08:44 + rob > > > said: > > > > > > > On 03/12/12 17:37, Andrea

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:46:20 +0100 thomasg said: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:08:44 + rob said: > > > > > On 03/12/12 17:37, Andreas Volz wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I've some problems to run some applications in Exebuf modu

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:08:44 + rob said: > > > On 03/12/12 17:37, Andreas Volz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've some problems to run some applications in Exebuf module placed in > > > ~/bin folder. I put a script there and shell co

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

It would appear that on Dec 4, Carsten Haitzler did say: > > exebuf was removed and replaced by evrything years ago. > And I for one am thankful for that. It was such an improvement. But of course, if somebody didn't know that some Linux distributions seem to keep seriously outdated snapshots

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:08:44 + rob said: > On 03/12/12 17:37, Andreas Volz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've some problems to run some applications in Exebuf module placed in > > ~/bin folder. I put a script there and shell could run it from any > > folder. But Exebuf couldn't run it. Even resta

Re: [e-users] Exebuf problems

On 03/12/12 17:37, Andreas Volz wrote: > Hello, > > I've some problems to run some applications in Exebuf module placed in > ~/bin folder. I put a script there and shell could run it from any > folder. But Exebuf couldn't run it. Even restart E17 didn't help. > > Do you get same experience? > > reg

[e-users] Exebuf problems

Hello, I've some problems to run some applications in Exebuf module placed in ~/bin folder. I put a script there and shell could run it from any folder. But Exebuf couldn't run it. Even restart E17 didn't help. Do you get same experience? regards Andreas -- Technical Blog

Re: [e-users] exebuf missing

Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:28:43AM +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: > On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:38:24 +0200 "Grzegorz And" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > What happend with exebuf? > > It's a module now. You will have to load it. > Looks like there is no deb yet. Anybody knows when it

Re: [e-users] exebuf missing

On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:38:24 +0200 "Grzegorz And" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What happend with exebuf? It's a module now. You will have to load it. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through l

[e-users] exebuf missing

What happend with exebuf? E17 version 0.16.999.040-0cvs20070803 from deb. -- Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger - This SF.net email is sponsored by

Re: [e-users] Exebuf...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:30:21 +0100 Anders Troback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:19:00 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:50:19 +0100 Anders Troback > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:

Re: [e-users] Exebuf...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:19:00 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:50:19 +0100 Anders Troback > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:44:15 +0900 > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue

Re: [e-users] Exebuf...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:50:19 +0100 Anders Troback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:44:15 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:10:19 +0100 Anders Troback > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:

Re: [e-users] Exebuf...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:44:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:10:19 +0100 Anders Troback > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:05:32 +0100 > > Anders Troback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > if I ru

Re: [e-users] Exebuf...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:10:19 +0100 Anders Troback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:05:32 +0100 > Anders Troback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > if I run scripts from exebuf that calls for programs like rdesktop and > > vncviewer nothing happens! > > > > Bug or fe

Re: [e-users] Exebuf...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:05:32 +0100 Anders Troback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > if I run scripts from exebuf that calls for programs like rdesktop and > vncviewer nothing happens! > > Bug or feature? > > Thanks! > > > \\troback > Correction: Scripts that takes one options on the comm

[e-users] Exebuf...

Hi, if I run scripts from exebuf that calls for programs like rdesktop and vncviewer nothing happens! Bug or feature? Thanks! \\troback -- Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. And 'No' is the answer! ---

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:00:22 + Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > Now, I have an idea here: > > exebuf does not list _all_ apps _ever_ if you type nothing then the list > is empty. > > would it be quicker to populate in the background only when something is > typed (thus limiti

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Now, I have an idea here: exebuf does not list _all_ apps _ever_ if you type nothing then the list is empty. would it be quicker to populate in the background only when something is typed (thus limiting the number of results returned)? Not sure that this would be quicker, but thought I would th

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:38:02 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Raster, > > As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after > the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the > window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. no it happ4ens AT the time exebuf

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:38:02 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raster, > > As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after > the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the > window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. > > BTW, if most people aren't havin

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Raster, As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. BTW, if most people aren't having this issue, I don't mind dropping it. It doesn't bother me *that* much. But th

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:22:06 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 05/02/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > > My tab-tab gives me 2800 possibilities on Gentoo on a reiserfs 3 di

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On 05/02/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > My tab-tab gives me 2800 possibilities on Gentoo on a reiserfs 3 disk > > (it's supposed to be a fast SATA disk too). Bash completion takes > > un

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 05/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Display all 3225 possibilities? (y or n) > > > > Are 3225 executables very much? I tested it on a Debian System with > > 1049 possibilities and it was _much_ faster (

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On 05/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Display all 3225 possibilities? (y or n) > > Are 3225 executables very much? I tested it on a Debian System with > 1049 possibilities and it was _much_ faster (this system/harddisk > is also much slower). So perhaps it's usefull to know the d

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:29:37 -0500 Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 2/5/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, I'll try this next weekend if no solution was found until then. > > Perhaps it's an interesting information that it takes nearly the same > > time if I press TAB-TAB i

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On 2/5/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'll try this next weekend if no solution was found until then. > Perhaps it's an interesting information that it takes nearly the same > time if I press TAB-TAB in an empty bash command and the system > collects all executables. It's intere

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Am Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:09:51 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > I was sure I tested it before and it failed. But now it works. Sorry > > for troubling you. Here is the dump file. I hope you could use it: > > > > http://brachttal.net/tmp/exebuf_dump > > so basically it looks like

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:09:18 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Am Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:26:42 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > > > i quote from my previous mail: > > > > "there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: > > opreport --symbols" > > I w

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Am Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:26:42 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > i quote from my previous mail: > > "there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: > opreport --symbols" I was sure I tested it before and it failed. But now it works. Sorry for troubling you. Here is th

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:50:29 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > unfortrunately thats nopt really in a usable form :( can u do: > opreport --symbols Pretty sure this will be useless to. Gotta recompile my kernel to get kernel symbols I think. I'm currently using t

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:28:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > It used to start up slowly f

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to > > test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you f

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:48:10 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 03/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool > > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf > > for the first time in an E

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > shortly I

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:54:19 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:40:33 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > > > > So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What > > > should I do? > > > > well it says your kernel doesnt supp

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > Hi, > > > > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool > > feature. More as a simple startin

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:40:33 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What > > should I do? > > well it says your kernel doesnt support oprofile! take a guess! :) Sorry for my stupid questions, but I never used oprofile an

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On 03/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf > for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E > session the exebuf needs some tim

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:50:39 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:44:59 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > > > > > could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just > > > > before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it i

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:44:59 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > > could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just > > > before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately > > > first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. > > > > Sure

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:51:15 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > > > > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool > > > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start th

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool > > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf > > for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E > > s

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hi, > > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf > for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E >

[e-users] exebuf preload?

Hi, shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is

Re: [e-users] exebuf?

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:41:04 -0500 roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Preytell what is exebuf ? its a 1 line executor. hit alt+secape to activate (by default). how type in the name of an application or executable. you can use tab-completion to complete along the way. above and below appear p

[e-users] exebuf?

Preytell what is exebuf ? -- The only constancy is change itself. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Fredrick P. Brooks, Jr. Roland A. Wilcher -

Re: [e-users] exebuf selection of apps (idea?)

Hello, * Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at [20060127 10:29]: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:15:55 + Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > Hello, > > > > i can definitely say that exebuf is a great feature of e17, but there is one > > thing that makes it a bit hard to use it.

Re: [e-users] exebuf selection of apps (idea?)

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:15:55 + Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hello, > > i can definitely say that exebuf is a great feature of e17, but there is one > thing that makes it a bit hard to use it. I couldn't figure out how i can > select the app that's not the 1. hit, but the 2. or

[e-users] exebuf selection of apps (idea?)

Hello, i can definitely say that exebuf is a great feature of e17, but there is one thing that makes it a bit hard to use it. I couldn't figure out how i can select the app that's not the 1. hit, but the 2. or 3. hit. Like raster mentioned if you search for something that's only in the eaps 'c