On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:58:11 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:25:29 +0200 thomasg
> said:
>
> i agree that a user should almost never switch frequencies by hand
> this is rather pointless. cpufreq allows it - but it's there for
> tweakers (like me) so i can
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:25:29 +0200 thomasg said:
i agree that a user should almost never switch frequencies by hand this is
rather pointless. cpufreq allows it - but it's there for tweakers (like me) so
i can even measure power usage at various freqs, performance etc. it's buried
inside a menu so
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:15:09 +1000 David Seikel said:
> I leave my E17 CPUfreq module configured with "Set CPU power policy" on
> "Automatic", "Powersaving behaviour" on "Automatic" and it does what I
> think you want with no issues.
>
> The difference between what you stated you want and what a
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Wido wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday August 25 2012 15:29:17 thomasg escribió:
>
>> I'm sorry, but your assumptions are fundamentally flawed.
>
>>
>
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Wido wrote:
>
>> > ondemand works based on priorities, not idliness. For example,
I leave my E17 CPUfreq module configured with "Set CPU power policy" on
"Automatic", "Powersaving behaviour" on "Automatic" and it does what I
think you want with no issues.
The difference between what you stated you want and what actually
happens is that the frequency drops when ever the entire s
On Saturday August 25 2012 15:29:17 thomasg escribió:
> I'm sorry, but your assumptions are fundamentally flawed.
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Wido wrote:
> > ondemand works based on priorities, not idliness. For example, in my debian
>
> It does not.
> However, it somewhat does take p
On Saturday, August 25, 2012, thomasg wrote:
> I'm sorry, but your assumptions are fundamentally flawed.
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Wido >
> wrote:
> > ondemand works based on priorities, not idliness. For example, in my
> debian
>
> It does not.
> However, it somewhat does take priority
I'm sorry, but your assumptions are fundamentally flawed.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Wido wrote:
> ondemand works based on priorities, not idliness. For example, in my debian
It does not.
However, it somewhat does take priority into account, which you can
disable by passing ignore_nice_loa
ondemand works based on priorities, not idliness. For example, in my debian
testing, my regular desktop apps have a priority of 23, so ondemand not always
rises the speed as I would like. Other example is when you go to lunch, you
usually just lock your screen, but how many really lower power co
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Wido wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yesterday I was thinking (yeah, sometimes I do that...specially when trying
> to fall asleep), would it be possible to add an option to the cpufreq module
> that, when E goes idle, the freq goes to th min value, and when you resume it
> goe
10 matches
Mail list logo
