On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:18:23 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
i agree here. i like our fairly flat (and lax) access structure. if we trust
you to go writing bits of e.org's website - we trust you to write code - if
that is your skill, or to just know to keep your hands off what
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so eventually went back to an old original method. www lives in cvs - u want
> to
> work on it, u get cvs access. committing means it auto-updates. if u need to
> test the php locally setting up a local a
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:46:01 -0700 "Ian Caldwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> So now it is your chance to tell us why we should be using a specific cms
> verses the alternative of just making our own specific to our needs and
> keeping it minimalistic. Please give the pros and the cons and explo
Err, not to burst your bubble or anything, but there wasn't a lot of
'writing' going on at get-e.
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 13:28 -0700, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> well, now that get-e is basically shut down. that opens up some more writers
> right there.
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:26 PM, dn sinclair <[
I can suggest http://bricolage.cc/ . I've heard good things about it,
and I'm a perl guy myself. Though according to wikipedia, a recent
version embeds the php5 interpreter, so the php guys can feel at home
too.
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:23 -0400, Sthithaprajna Garapaty wrote:
> The only reason for
well, now that get-e is basically shut down. that opens up some more writers
right there.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:26 PM, dn sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 3:41 PM, Veli Ogla Sungutay wrote:
>
> > Articles friends. We need lots of them. Even a small tutorial, small
> > us
The major part. If it is not done already, separate the presentation
from the logic code. Make sure a designer can do the job of styling the
site without touching any underlying code.
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:04 -0700, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> What would you like to see on the new website? What goals
Should it be strictly written in php? The current website uses php, but
perhaps the doors are open for other languages, and the cmses written in
them.
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 10:46 -0700, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> So now it is your chance to tell us why we should be using a specific cms
> verses the alt
There are a bunch of articles, but you won't reach them easily (like in a
list). (I always need to consult something on the wiki or docs and it's
always a pain to find related links).
I think a list of related links (such as wikipedia.org ones) at the bottom
would be really useful.
Cheersm
2008/
Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on all pages
that has links to pretty much everything. The goal of the new site is make
it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of static
content around it.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAI
What would you like to see on the new website? What goals do you think it
should have.
My personal views are this is what we need to see differently. Feel free to
chime in and add to what you'd like to see on the new site
*1. Create links to all the software ( wiki, bug tracker, forums,
sour
So now it is your chance to tell us why we should be using a specific cms
verses the alternative of just making our own specific to our needs and
keeping it minimalistic. Please give the pros and the cons and explorer the
issues that would involve e directly (e.g. themeing, translations etc etc)
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
