Re: [e-users] bindings.cfg documentation?

Oz wrote: Hi, where is the bindings.cfg documentation? Look in /usr/share/e16/config/bindings.cfg. Since the (very irritating, bad) changes (shame on you), it took me a while to find out: - It's not the ".enlightenment" dir any more. - It's not even the ".enlightenment/keybindings.cfg". The

Re: [e-users] Processor at 100% opening Eclipse on another desktop

> i believe that what's going on here is pretty > simple, and completely > unrelated to E. the splash screen seems to be > waiting for the main > application window to get whatever X event equates > to "bring window to > front". (can you tell i'm not an X programmer?) > once that happens

Re: [e-users] Processor at 100% opening Eclipse on another desktop

Alejandro Salas wrote: Do you know what is actually using the CPU? You should be able to get an idea pretty quickly by running top. Java holds over 80% of the CPU. After I go to the desktop it dessapears from the top list.     i see the same behavior.     i believe that

Re: [e-users] Processor at 100% opening Eclipse on another desktop

> Do you know what is actually using the CPU? You > should be able to get > an idea pretty quickly by running top. Java holds over 80% of the CPU. After I go to the desktop it dessapears from the top list. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! M

Re: [e-users] Processor at 100% opening Eclipse on another desktop

Do you know what is actually using the CPU? You should be able to get an idea pretty quickly by running top. On 3/16/06, Alejandro Salas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I set my e17 to remember size, position, border and > desktop for Eclipse. The problem is that if I open > eclipse

[e-users] Processor at 100% opening Eclipse on another desktop

Hi everyone. I set my e17 to remember size, position, border and desktop for Eclipse. The problem is that if I open eclipse while being on another desktop, it opens fine but the processor stays at 100% use until I go to the desktop where eclipse is. I have done a couple of test with other apps and

Re: [e-users] Problem with CVS?

Martin Zwickel wrote: On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:08:00 -0500 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled: 2 days now, cannot access either web-based or capture cvs source directly. Just thought you should know. Other sf sites seem to still work. Yeah, have the same problem since some days (at leas

Re: [e-users] Problem with CVS?

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:14:12 -0500, Michael Kelly wrote: snip... > So, this was a planned service outage(?), but they seem to have gone > over their window without any further information. Of course, we can't > complain when we get access to this normally working service for free. http://source

Re: [e-users] Problem with CVS?

Peter wrote: > 2 days now, cannot access either web-based or capture cvs source directly. > Just thought you should know. Other sf sites seem to still work. Sourceforge acknowledges this problem on their status page : ( 2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Serv

Re: [e-users] Problem with CVS?

Am Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:18:11 +0100 schrieb Andreas Volz: > Am Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:08:00 -0500 schrieb Peter: > > > 2 days now, cannot access either web-based or capture cvs source > > directly. Just thought you should know. Other sf sites seem to still > > work. > > I know that anonymous CVS on

Re: [e-users] Problem with CVS?

Am Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:08:00 -0500 schrieb Peter: > 2 days now, cannot access either web-based or capture cvs source > directly. Just thought you should know. Other sf sites seem to still > work. I know that anonymous CVS on sf.net is sometimes bad, but developers CVS should most time work. I use

Re: [e-users] Problem with CVS?

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:08:00 -0500 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled: > 2 days now, cannot access either web-based or capture cvs source > directly. Just thought you should know. Other sf sites seem to still > work. Yeah, have the same problem since some days (at least CVS). # cvs upd -d -A cvs

[e-users] Problem with CVS?

2 days now, cannot access either web-based or capture cvs source directly. Just thought you should know. Other sf sites seem to still work. -- Peter --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends

[e-users] bindings.cfg documentation?

Hi, where is the bindings.cfg documentation? Since the (very irritating, bad) changes (shame on you), it took me a while to find out: - It's not the ".enlightenment" dir any more. - It's not even the ".enlightenment/keybindings.cfg". The REDME-??? says ".e16/e_config.bindings"; can I copy "/us