David Seikel wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:29:11 -0800 Ralph Alvy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I've searched the web for DR17 docs and have come up short. I'm
>> assuming DR16 docs just won't do for DR17. Every link I found for
>> "unofficial" DR17 docs was dead. Can someone point me to on
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:29:11 -0800 Ralph Alvy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've searched the web for DR17 docs and have come up short. I'm
> assuming DR16 docs just won't do for DR17. Every link I found for
> "unofficial" DR17 docs was dead. Can someone point me to one? I can't
> figure out how to
I've searched the web for DR17 docs and have come up short. I'm assuming
DR16 docs just won't do for DR17. Every link I found for "unofficial" DR17
docs was dead. Can someone point me to one? I can't figure out how to add
an application to a desktop menu, for starters.
--
Am Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:12:36 +
schrieb Ruben Vandamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently testing Xgl, however I came across a "problem". To
> have the gl effects I have to use compiz and gnome-window-decorator.
> But it possible to start e17 without the window-manager part (just
>
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:02:25 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:35:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hehe - even those that don't tend to agree that a production server
> > remotely located is likely best dealt with
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:29:25 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> David Seikel wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:46:53 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>any further - any more suggestions?
> >
> >
> > Probably time to start the "What OS
>>> OS flamewar
>> Debian
I vote Openbsd. I personally like that for servers. ethier that or netbsd or
freebsd will do.
I would go with Trustix. :)
--
Morten
:wq
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fil
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:35:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hehe - even those that don't tend to agree that a production server
> remotely located is likely best dealt with with debian. we can't just
> plonk a new cd in... :)
The rasterman has spoken.
pg
I vote Openbsd. I personally like that for servers. ethier that or netbsd or freebsd will do.--IncOn 2/19/06, Curtis Napier <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:11:17 +1000 David Seikel <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:46
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:11:17 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:46:53 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> any further - any more suggestions?
>> Probably time to start the "Wh
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:29:25 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And Debian stable is also very old because of the approach Debian
> takes to updates.
Yes, we work on a bleeding edge window manager, but there is a reason
it's called "bleeding".
Old is good when you want something that ha
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:11:17 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:46:53 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > any further - any more suggestions?
>
> Probably time to start the "What OS should it run?" flame war now. B-)
T
David Seikel wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:46:53 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any further - any more suggestions?
Probably time to start the "What OS should it run?" flame war now. B-)
Even though I don't use it on the desktop, Debian Stable always get
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:46:53 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any further - any more suggestions?
Probably time to start the "What OS should it run?" flame war now. B-)
Even though I don't use it on the desktop, Debian Stable always gets
recommended by me for
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Geoffrey wrote:
Updated my e17 on the 18th. After this update, I can't switch to a
virtual terminal. What I get is my desktop image with a 5 cm black
space at the top that appears to be the contents of the virtual
terminal screen. If I hit the enter key I can see the lo
OK - I thought its time to say something here.
It seems we are on the road to get our own dedicated boxes. We likely will move
development CVS too - SF.NET has been iffy with their DEV CVS support of late
as well and our own DEV CVS will let us offer anoncvs mirrors trivially via
rsync. WWW wil
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:12:36 + Ruben Vandamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently testing Xgl, however I came across a "problem". To have
> the gl effects I have to use compiz and gnome-window-decorator. But it
> possible to start e17 without the window-manager part (just
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 11:12 +, Ruben Vandamme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently testing Xgl, however I came across a "problem". To have
> the gl effects I have to use compiz and gnome-window-decorator. But it
> possible to start e17 without the window-manager part (just the
> desktop). I've a
Hi,
I'm currently testing Xgl, however I came across a "problem". To have
the gl effects I have to use compiz and gnome-window-decorator. But it
possible to start e17 without the window-manager part (just the
desktop). I've already been able to do it the other way: using e17 as my
window-man
19 matches
Mail list logo
