Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:38:02 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Raster, > > As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after > the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the > window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. no it happ4ens AT the time exebuf

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:38:02 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raster, > > As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after > the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the > window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. > > BTW, if most people aren't havin

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Dusik
Raster, As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. BTW, if most people aren't having this issue, I don't mind dropping it. It doesn't bother me *that* much. But th

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:22:06 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 05/02/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > > My tab-tab gives me 2800 possibilities on Gentoo on a reiserfs 3 di

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Dusik
On 05/02/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > My tab-tab gives me 2800 possibilities on Gentoo on a reiserfs 3 disk > > (it's supposed to be a fast SATA disk too). Bash completion takes > > un

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 05/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Display all 3225 possibilities? (y or n) > > > > Are 3225 executables very much? I tested it on a Debian System with > > 1049 possibilities and it was _much_ faster (

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Dusik
On 05/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Display all 3225 possibilities? (y or n) > > Are 3225 executables very much? I tested it on a Debian System with > 1049 possibilities and it was _much_ faster (this system/harddisk > is also much slower). So perhaps it's usefull to know the d

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:29:37 -0500 Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 2/5/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, I'll try this next weekend if no solution was found until then. > > Perhaps it's an interesting information that it takes nearly the same > > time if I press TAB-TAB i

Re: [e-users] e17 calendar module - minor bug?

2006-02-05 Thread Nathan A. Smith
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 13:58 -0600, Laurence Vanek wrote: > I note that ~5 seconds after this module is enabled the year changes > from "2006" to "106". If I advance a month then back to Feb the correct > year shows properly, only to revert to "106" again after ~5 seconds. > > Perhaps this is on

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Ben
On 2/5/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'll try this next weekend if no solution was found until then. > Perhaps it's an interesting information that it takes nearly the same > time if I press TAB-TAB in an empty bash command and the system > collects all executables. It's intere

RE: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS & Servers - YOU CAN HELP!

2006-02-05 Thread Gorman, Mitch
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morten Nilsen Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 9:44 PM To: eusers Subject: Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS & Servers - > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> I would say give t

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:09:51 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > I was sure I tested it before and it failed. But now it works. Sorry > > for troubling you. Here is the dump file. I hope you could use it: > > > > http://brachttal.net/tmp/exebuf_dump > > so basically it looks like