Re: [e-users] engages systray

2005-12-11 Thread Mike Kelly
Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: Hi there! Can we use only a systray, without engage somehow? Yes, you can get an application like trayer to do the job just fine. -- Mike Kelly --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep throu

Re: [e-users] segfaults.

2005-12-11 Thread James McCarthy
I get this too. Typically you have to kill the program when it's iconfied and then click on it in ibox. This causes a pretty much immediate segfault of E17 for me. This happens a lot to me when I'm debugging a program in Eclipse. If I iconify the application I'm debugging, then terminate the de

[e-users] engages systray

2005-12-11 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Hi there! Can we use only a systray, without engage somehow? Thanks, Martin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your lo

Re: [e-users] New Login for entrance

2005-12-11 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2005, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: > > Thank you. BTW. Do you know how I can read out the integer and use this > > in a script? I have a script called e17update for gentoo, I would like > > to add this at the end of it. > > I would do some

Re: [e-users] New Login for entrance

2005-12-11 Thread Morten Nilsen
Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: Thank you. BTW. Do you know how I can read out the integer and use this in a script? I have a script called e17update for gentoo, I would like to add this at the end of it. I would do something like count=$(ecore_config .. | awk '{print $2}') Cheers, -- Morten :wq

Re: [e-users] New Login for evidence

2005-12-11 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2005, 19:33 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: > > Hi there! > > > > How can I create a login for evidence, wich starts only an xterm? > > (Instead of failsafe.) > > do you mean entrance? Oh, yes of course. Thank you. BTW. Do you know how I can read

Re: [e-users] New Login for evidence

2005-12-11 Thread Morten Nilsen
Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: Hi there! How can I create a login for evidence, wich starts only an xterm? (Instead of failsafe.) do you mean entrance? ecore_config -c /etc/entrance_config.cfg -k /entrance/session/count -g ecore_config -c /etc/entrance_config.cfg -k /entrance/session//session -

[e-users] New Login for evidence

2005-12-11 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Hi there! How can I create a login for evidence, wich starts only an xterm? (Instead of failsafe.) Thanks, Martin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX sea

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Williams
thanks, well - I looked at the xfce code and I cannot see what they are doing that is different - perhaps someone with more experience reading GTK could tell me otherwise?? A On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 05:26:37PM +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:22:07 + > Andrew Williams <[EM

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:22:07 + Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you have something that you could point me to, engage handles the > system tray itself and it might indeed be midding a hint... > > A Well, one thing is that kde uses a kded module called kdetrayproxy to make the

Re: [e-users] segfaults.

2005-12-11 Thread Morten Nilsen
Andrew Williams wrote: roland wrote: Hi all Anyone have any idea about a bug causing segfaults when an iconified window exits ? I see this a lot and also saw mention of this in the E todo list. Will this be fixed? I too see segfaults, but they don't happen immediately, like you report... I

Re: [e-users] segfaults.

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Williams
if either if you are running engage this could have happened, though it was fixed last week. Andy On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 04:23:51PM +0100, Morten Nilsen wrote: > roland wrote: > >Hi all Anyone have any idea about a bug causing segfaults > >when an iconified window exits ? I see this a lot and al

Re: [e-users] segfaults.

2005-12-11 Thread Justin
roland wrote: Hi all Anyone have any idea about a bug causing segfaults when an iconified window exits ? I see this a lot and also saw mention of this in the E todo list. Will this be fixed? I can reproduce this quite reliably by for example iconifying an xterm and sending it a kill sig after it

Re: [e-users] segfaults.

2005-12-11 Thread Morten Nilsen
roland wrote: Hi all Anyone have any idea about a bug causing segfaults when an iconified window exits ? I see this a lot and also saw mention of this in the E todo list. Will this be fixed? I too see segfaults, but they don't happen immediately, like you report... I see them if I uniconify th

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Williams
do you have something that you could point me to, engage handles the system tray itself and it might indeed be midding a hint... A On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:10:15PM +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:42:29 +0100 > Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2

[e-users] segfaults.

2005-12-11 Thread roland
Hi all Anyone have any idea about a bug causing segfaults when an iconified window exits ? I see this a lot and also saw mention of this in the E todo list. Will this be fixed? I can reproduce this quite reliably by for example iconifying an xterm and sending it a kill sig after it goes into iconb

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:10:15 +0100 Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:42:29 +0100 > Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:29:55 + > > Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Thomas Kuther wrote: > > > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:42:29 +0100 Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:29:55 + > Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thomas Kuther wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:22:05 + > > > Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlight

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:29:55 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Kuther wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:22:05 + > > Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne wrote: > >> > I wonder if it is a bug in amarok or e17? > >

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Foxy
Thomas Kuther wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:22:05 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne wrote: I wonder if it is a bug in amarok or e17? o_O ¿bug? e17 dont have a systray that's is why the icons dont apear in a systray sorry, I

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:22:05 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne wrote: > >> I wonder if it is a bug in amarok or e17? > >> > > > > o_O ¿bug? e17 dont have a systray that's is why the icons > > dont apear in a systray > > > > > > > sorry, I did not mentio

Re: [e-users] amarok and systray

2005-12-11 Thread Foxy
DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne wrote: I wonder if it is a bug in amarok or e17? o_O ¿bug? e17 dont have a systray that's is why the icons dont apear in a systray sorry, I did not mentioned here, I a running engage and gaim, skype and tomboy sit fine in its systray. But amarok and kkbs