[e-users] Transparency

2003-10-27 Thread Justin Parker
I appreciate your replies and I'm sorry I keep bringing up stuff you've already talked about. I was thinking though, aol IM has a add on or improvement called "Dead AIM" it allows for Alpha-Channel Translucency (I guess this is the element that allows for real-transparency). I don't know anything

Re: [e-users] Transperancy

2003-10-27 Thread Ben Rockwood
This comes up alot, and I should add it to the FAQ. Here's the explanation. Transpency, or the perception of it, comes in two flavors. Pseudo-transparency and Alpha-Channel Translucency (or Real-Transparency). The method used by most systems today is Pseudo-Transparency. This is the method of

Re: [e-users] Transperancy

2003-10-27 Thread Hall Stevenson
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 22:50, Justin Parker wrote: > I'm trying to find out if Eterm can be configured to be transparent. I > realize it can be transparent to the desktop but can it be transparent > to other applications and windows? In it's current state, no. As I recall, it's a limitation in X-W

Re: [e-users] Transperancy

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 17:50, Justin Parker wrote: > I'm trying to find out if Eterm can be configured to be transparent. I > realize it can be transparent to the desktop but can it be transparent > to other applications and windows? No. Currently the only way to do this is my grabbing a snapshot

[e-users] Transperancy

2003-10-27 Thread Justin Parker
I'm trying to find out if Eterm can be configured to be transparent. I realize it can be transparent to the desktop but can it be transparent to other applications and windows? Justin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation