https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28724
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28194
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
Resolut
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28723
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27337
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24498
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28240
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
We got rid of the zero-permission 000 files with:
commit 8b568fdea8e1baea3d68cc38dec587e4c9219276
Author: Aaron Merey
Date: Fri Apr 8 19:37:11 2022 -0400
PR29022: 000-permissions files cause probl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28583
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #2)
> Hmm, I restarted the build and now it succeeded.
Is this still an issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29092
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29092
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29093
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29103
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #6
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29117
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29117
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 14090
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14090&action=edit
More fd leaks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29122
Bug ID: 29122
Summary: MHD_USE_DUAL_STACK doesn't work when ipv6 is disabled
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29123
Bug ID: 29123
Summary: MHD_USE_EPOLL doesn't work
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: debuginfod
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29122
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29123
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29141
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29122
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29123
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29150
Bug ID: 29150
Summary: Would be useful to have a filter in eu-readelf like
--name=
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
You might want to ask someone who knows about how freebsd provides argp to see
if they understand why your CFLAGS seem to contain
-I/usr/local/share/gnulib/lib and your LDFLAGS contain
/usr/local/lib/libar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29158
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Sorry you have to ask whoever added -I/usr/local/share/gnulib/lib to CFLAGS how
that is supposed to work. Obviously the argp.h header found there isn't usable
as is. Normally people build against glibc or
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29180
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
Assig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29176
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29176
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Letu Ren from comment #3)
> I just installed glibc-debug package as the debug symbol in ArchLinux and
> rebuilt the package. Tests of run-backtrace-native*.sh are successful
Great. Then this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29180
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23903
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27337
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kurt at roeckx dot be
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28579
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Thanks. This looks nice and simple. Few small comments:
- The dwfl_frame_reg should be in a new ELFUTILS_0.188 { global:
dwfl_frame_reg; } ELFUTILS_0.186; section (that is, this symbol is new in
ELFUTILS_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28204
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Still reviewing patch, but we seem to also need a configure check to make sure
we have a new enough rpm to recognize the rhel9 rpm, otherwise some tests will
fail with:
+ rpm2cpio ../../R/debuginfod-rpms/
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28325
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |mark at klomp dot org
Ever
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Pablo Galindo Salgado from comment #2)
> > it could in theory also be zero
>
> In this case, the result was 0 (I am working with Matt)
Interesting, I assumed it was on a failure path.
My pro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29434
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> But if the result is zero I don't believe I fully understand yet how the
> leak happens.
So I believe this may happen if we found an inlined subroutine with p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29450
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29450
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Did the binutils 2.39 commit:
commit e8cf73215187b0c08679d726a5cc7c019fa3ea2e
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed Aug 10 10:34:22 2022 +0200
gas/Dwarf: properly skip zero-size functions
Fix this?
In t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjw at fedoraproject dot org |mark at klomp dot org
--- Comm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #2)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> > Do you mean support for an HTTP HEAD (instead of GET) request?
>
> Yep, that's what I'm seeking for :)
>
> > O
301 - 342 of 342 matches
Mail list logo