https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22288
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to H. Brueckner from comment #2)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> > The .eh_frame is a loaded section, which means it won't go into the .debug
> > file. So yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #4)
> So, if you could provide the output of eu-readelf --relocs paes_s390.ko (on
> your combined paes_s390.ko containing both code and debug) that wo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to H. Brueckner from comment #8)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #4)
> > > So, if you could provide the output of e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to H. Brueckner from comment #10)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #9)
> > But the output does confirm what I feared. The R_390_PC32 .rela.eh_frame
> > relocations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22496
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Failed to obtain CFI data |Extend ebl_reloc_ hooks
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22546
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22546
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
I believe your fix is correct. And we really do want to calculate the stride
only once based on the array element type, not for each dimension. I am not
sure what the original code tried to do. It
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22546
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22652
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22652
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22675
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22675
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22892
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22865
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
*** Bug 22864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22864
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22865
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22865
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
*** Bug 22863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22863
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22892
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22801
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|elfutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21009
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> I think we can assume everybody uses glibc or a modern alternative that
> already implements the resolved_path == NULL feature. So I would simply
> c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22865
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21009
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21002
Bug 21002 depends on bug 21009, which changed state.
Bug 21009 Summary: Incompatible with MUSL libc: canonicalize_file_name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21009
What|Removed |Added
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21002
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca from comment #7)
> I'm back with news.
> [...]
> Almost there!
Thanks for the overview. If at all possible, could you open separate bugs for
these i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22976
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22976
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22976
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
I noticed there is a CVE linked to this bug report:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-8769
Note that this bug was NOT in a released version of elfutils.
It was introduced by the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23011
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23011
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23011
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23173
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23213
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23247
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23247
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> While looking at this I also noticed that for this test file eu-readelf
> --debug-dump=ranges claims to find some unused garbage in .debug_ranges,
&
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23248
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23248
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
Martin pointed out that only works (on 64bit) if ndirlist was actually a size_t
(like nfilelist already is). So the full patch would be:
diff --git a/libdw/dwarf_getsrclines.c b/libdw/dwarf_getsrclines.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23247
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23248
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23301
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23320
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23320
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23370
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Replicated under valgrind:
$ valgrind -q eu-readelf -S Double-free-libelf
==13892== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
==13892==at 0x48369EB: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:530)
==13892
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23529
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23541
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23542
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23542
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23541
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23529
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23541
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
For reference, this bug apparently got assigned CVE-2018-16062.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
Apparently this bug got assigned CVE-2018-16402
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23529
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
CVE-2018-16403
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Note that we have an s390x fedora buildbot worker that also uses GCC 8.1.1:
https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#/workers/5
That one is green.
So I suspect it is either a different binutils or glibc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
It does seem to work correctly on Fedora 29 with gcc 8.2, binutils 2.31 and
glibc 2.28:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/elfutils/0.174/1.fc29/data/logs/s390x/build.log
PASS: run-backtrace
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard ---
The test case does use assert and abort too much. How about we extend Dmitry's
patch to get rid of them all (the only abort that should be there is the one in
cleanup-13.c).
diff --git a/tests/back
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #16 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #15)
> Thanks Mark, I installed the patch but I see still the same.
The output was exactly the same? That is surprising. So there is no additional
output t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #18 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #17)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #15)
> > > Thanks Mark, I installed the patch b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23752
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23752
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Proposed patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/elfutils-devel/2018-q4/msg00022.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23755
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23753
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23752
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
*** Bug 23753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23754
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23782
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #20 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Michael Hudson-Doyle from comment #19)
> I see a similar looking failure on arm64 on Ubuntu 18.10:
>
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/391377304/buildlog_ubuntu-cos
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #22 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Michael Hudson-Doyle from comment #21)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Michael Hudson-Doyle from comment #19)
> > > I see a similar lookin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23786
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23787
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23752
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23755
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23754
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23782
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23786
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23787
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23787
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
For reference this was assigned CVE-2018-18520.
Note that the description of the CVE is misleading.
The bug is in eu-size, not in libelf elf_end.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23786
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
For reference this was assigned CVE-2018-18521.
Note that this bug was not in a generic library, just in the code shared by the
eu-ar and eu-ranlib binaries.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23752
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
For reference this was assigned CVE-2018-18310.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23787
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libelf |tools
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23786
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |tools
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23884
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23884
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23884
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23901
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23901
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
Odd, the trap on exit really should remove those.
But explicitly cleaning the test files seems to work:
diff --git a/tests/backtrace-subr.sh b/tests/backtrace-subr.sh
index ff42c6f..53c719d 100644
--- a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23903
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23901
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23911
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23911
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23902
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Kurt Roeckx from comment #2)
> At least on mips I'm seeing an .eh_frame and .eh_frame_hdr section. It also
> has some mips specific sections.
Assuming they have "normal"
2801 - 2900 of 3442 matches
Mail list logo