Hi Roland,
On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 12:43 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Personally I'm not concerned with any non-build-ID use cases any more.
> I don't know if the rest of the world is OK with presuming that build
> ID-based lookup is always the only thing you want nowadays.
> But it seems plausibl
Hi Romain,
Just to let you know I am looking at this. But haven't made much
progress in understanding it yet. Thanks so much for the reproducer. I
have been able to see the (very slow) parsing of the core file with it.
$ time ./mimic-systemd-coredump
[...]
real3m35.965s
user0m0.722s
sys
> Le 19 juin 2023 à 17:08, Mark Wielaard a écrit :
>
> Hi Romain,
>
> Just to let you know I am looking at this. But haven't made much
> progress in understanding it yet. Thanks so much for the reproducer. I
> have been able to see the (very slow) parsing of the core file with it.
Hi,
Thanks !
> > Which does bring up the question why systemd-coredump isn't running
> in
> > the same mount space as the crashing program. Then it would simply
> find
> > the files that the crashing program is using.
>
> On this point that systemd-coredump might not run in the same mount
> namespace, don’t bl
