On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 00:42 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Gets us DT_AARCH64_BTI_PLT and DT_AARCH64_PAC_PLT.
Pushed.
On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 00:42 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> +2020-08-28 Mark Wielard
> +
> + * aarch64_init.c (aarch64_init): Hook dynamic_tag_name and
> + dynamic_tag_check.
> + * aarch64_symbol.c (aarch64_dynamic_tag_name): New function.
> + (aarch64_dynamic_tag_check): Likewise.
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 23:48 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> In both debug_ranges and debug_loc a base address entry can be the
> first in the range or loc list. If so print the offset and set first
> to false. Otherwise don't print the entry list offset, but do set
> first to false.
Pushed.
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 17:28 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 11:56 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > When building with gcc -mbranch-protection= we might get a gnu property
> > note indicating BTI (Branch Target Identification) and/or PAC (Pointer
> > Authentication Code) is being
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 17:58 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state is used on aarch64 to indicate whether
> or not the return address is mangled or not. This has the same value
> as the DW_CFA_GNU_window_save. So we have to pass around the e_machine
> value of the process or c
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:03 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On irc Martin was asking about doing a new release. I do think it is
> time for 0.181. But I am struggling a bit with Fedora arm64 which has
> turned on BTI/PAC which caused some issues:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23787
Ikechukwu ike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||support at youwin dot org.ng
--- Comm
