[Bug backends/24102] New: A Heap-buffer-overflow problem was discovered in the function read_srclines in dwarf_getsrclines.c in libdw

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24102 Bug ID: 24102 Summary: A Heap-buffer-overflow problem was discovered in the function read_srclines in dwarf_getsrclines.c in libdw Product: elfutils Version: unspecified

[Bug backends/24102] A Heap-buffer-overflow problem was discovered in the function read_srclines in dwarf_getsrclines.c in libdw

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24102 --- Comment #2 from wcventure --- Created attachment 11544 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11544&action=edit POC3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug backends/24102] A Heap-buffer-overflow problem was discovered in the function read_srclines in dwarf_getsrclines.c in libdw

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24102 --- Comment #1 from wcventure --- Created attachment 11543 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11543&action=edit POC2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libelf/24103] New: Invalid address Deference in elf64_xlatetom in elf32_xlatetom.c in libelf

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24103 Bug ID: 24103 Summary: Invalid address Deference in elf64_xlatetom in elf32_xlatetom.c in libelf Product: elfutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug libelf/24103] Invalid address Deference in elf64_xlatetom in elf32_xlatetom.c in libelf

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24103 --- Comment #1 from wcventure --- Created attachment 11546 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11546&action=edit POC2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[PATCH] Use separate files for strip outputs

Let's see if this works: Apparently I cannot get a properly formatted inline diff through. Therefore, please find the pull request, including diff, as attachment. regards, Ulf The following changes since commit e65d91d21cb09d83b001fef9435e576ba447db32: libelf: Correct overflow check in note_x

[PATCH] configure: Add new --enable-install-elfh option.

We explicitly test (with system-elf-libelf) that our include headers work with the system elf.h header. But it might be helpful to install the elf.h file for a private install. Our elf.h header really is just a copy of the latest glibc elf.h. But it might be newer and include more constants than th

Re: [PATCH] configure: Add new --enable-install-elfh option.

I think you should also adapt tests/Makefile.am to use our own elf.h in this case. See https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/187812/25 for my solution to this.

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add initial return value location support.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:26 AM Mark Wielaard wrote: > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#procedure-calling-convention > But I couldn't find an official DWARF register mapping. > If you have references I like to add them to the code. This document now has a chap

[Bug tools/24089] NT_PLATFORM core file note should be a zero terminated string

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24089 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---