https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liska ---
Thanks Mark, I installed the patch but I see still the same. For now, I'm
leaving that, I'm not so much interested in s390x ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #16 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #15)
> Thanks Mark, I installed the patch but I see still the same.
The output was exactly the same? That is surprising. So there is no additional
output that expla
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liska ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #16)
> (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #15)
> > Thanks Mark, I installed the patch but I see still the same.
>
> The output was exactly the same? That is sur
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
--- Comment #18 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #17)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #15)
> > > Thanks Mark, I installed the patch but I see still the same
To debug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23673
clean up the test framework so we know what exactly failed.
Suggested-by: Dmitry V. Levin
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
tests/ChangeLog | 7 +++
tests/backtrace-dwarf.c | 38 --
2
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 14:24 +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > We suspect perf to offset its recording-addresses of mmapped
> > dsos/executables starting with a specific section, such that they
> > denote
> > their pointers with this pg_offset parameter. (e.g. skipping a
> > library's
> > header and set
