On 2017/05/24 10:05PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This adds a minimal fallback unwinder for ppc64[le] in case we cannot find
> CFI for a particular address. It simply always sets the program counter to
> the link register, picks the previous stack pointer from the backchain,
> and the previous link reg
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 13:28 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > + if (! readfunc(sp + LR_OFFSET, &newLr, arg))
>
> should this be newSp + LR_OFFSET, since the LR save area is in the
> caller's stack frame?
Of course. You are entirely right.
This also explains why the testcase didn't seem to work c
On 30/05/2017 16:37, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 13:28 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>>> + if (! readfunc(sp + LR_OFFSET, &newLr, arg))
>>
>> should this be newSp + LR_OFFSET, since the LR save area is in the
>> caller's stack frame?
>
> Of course. You are entirely right.
>
> T
