ELFUTILS 0.169 - http://elfutils.org/
A new release of elfutils is available at:
ftp://sourceware.org/pub/elfutils/0.169/
or https://sourceware.org/elfutils/ftp/0.169/
* NEWS *
backends: Add support for EM_PPC64 GNU_ATTRIBUTES.
Frame pointer unwinding fallback support for i386, x86_64,
Hi Ulf,
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 13:26 +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> My problem right now is that I have about 50 more patches pending
> locally and I will be gone from May 12th to sometime in August. So, I
> probably won't manage to post and fix all of them here before autumn.
> Yet, I still need them
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 18:03 +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> We don't use those anywhere else and they are not guaranteed to be
> defined. Also, put the 'extern "C"' after the included headers.
Note that elf.h is somewhat special. We import it as-is from glibc and
like to not have divergence if at all
Hi Torsten,
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 22:34 +0200, Torsten Polle wrote:
> I compile the simple program relative.c:
>
> int main()
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> with the command "gcc -g ../2017-05-03-elfutils/relative.c -o relative“.
>
> When I run systemtap with the command
> /opt/tooling/adit/systemta
Hi Milian,
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 18:05 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> I noticed that elfutils fails to handle clang binaries when we want to find a
> DIE for a certain address. I.e. dwfl_module_addrdie returns nullptr, and eu-
> addr2line fails to resolve inlined frames.
>
> To reproduce this:
>[
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21247
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
Looking at the debug_info we do have:
[39ca09]subprogram
low_pc (addr) +0x002c08b0
<_Z20PlatformCrashHandleriP9siginfo_tPv>
high_pc (addr)
Hi Ulf,
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 18:56 +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> all patches I consider suitable for upstream right now have been
> posted here now. With all of them applied you still don't get useful
> elfutils on windows, as for example the date preservation in some of
> the tools doesn't work. I
Hello,
I work on ABRT improvement in order to increase security related to
core backtrace generating using elfutils library.
Here is a short description of my problem:
Goal is to not call base code in elfutils and gdb functions under root.
If you are more interested you can read more there:
https
Hi -
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 06:25:30PM +0200, Adam Šulc wrote:
> [...]
> Do you have any idea how to pass the open file descriptor into the
> function? Or what is the best way how to achieve this?
Via file name "/dev/fd/232" ?
- FChE
