Hi -
> > My C++ is pretty terrible, but couldn't you handle that with something
> > like:
>
> Ah, yes, good eye, pclose and fclose are interchangeable function
> pointers. (close(2) along the lines of your other suggestion wouldn't
> be.)
pushed to master, with another instance of this improvem
Hi -
> My C++ is pretty terrible, but couldn't you handle that with something
> like:
Ah, yes, good eye, pclose and fclose are interchangeable function
pointers. (close(2) along the lines of your other suggestion wouldn't
be.)
- FChE
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 08:57 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > Yes, lets make =CMD optional. But why assume "cat"? Can't you then
> > simply use fopen instaed of popen in the code to get the FILE* to pass
> > to archive_read_open_FILE? Or even just open and archive_read_open_fd?
>
> One
Hi -
> Yes, lets make =CMD optional. But why assume "cat"? Can't you then
> simply use fopen instaed of popen in the code to get the FILE* to pass
> to archive_read_open_FILE? Or even just open and archive_read_open_fd?
One reason: the defer_dtor<>-based auto-closing of these objects is
different
Hi -
> Yes, lets make =CMD optional. But why assume "cat"? Can't you then
> simply use fopen instaed of popen in the code to get the FILE* to pass
> to archive_read_open_FILE? Or even just open and archive_read_open_fd?
Sounds like a plan.
- FChE
Hi Frank,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 06:44:02AM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > [...] I think it would be better if you could simply leave off the
> > conversion CMD and just provide an EXT (without =). This would then
> > just pass the file with the given extension to libarchive directly
> > (the
Hi -
> I really like how simple adding this feature is. Shows the design for
> adding new formats was done with some foresight.
Thanks!
> [...] I think it would be better if you could simply leave off the
> conversion CMD and just provide an EXT (without =). This would then
> just pass the file
Hi Frank,
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:09:18PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> A little extension lets us process arch-linux archives. Awaiting
> for some small test .pkg's from the arch folks for the elfutils
> testsuite. However, hand-testing on severa larger files works!
>
> commit b51ae89bef
Hi -
A little extension lets us process arch-linux archives. Awaiting
for some small test .pkg's from the arch folks for the elfutils
testsuite. However, hand-testing on severa larger files works!
commit b51ae89befeb81c8b51b15b7168c6e616255b486 (fche/pacman-Z)
Author: Frank Ch. Eigler
Date: