Hi Frank,
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 14:25 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > I see, I missed that both functions are only called after first
> > checking the archive type. I think it might be helpful/clearer if
> > both methods would be called with the intended archive type then,
> > also because that
Hi -
> I see, I missed that both functions are only called after first
> checking the archive type. I think it might be helpful/clearer if both
> methods would be called with the intended archive type then, also
> because that might make it simpler to...
The archive subtype (rpm vs deb) is not st
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 22:03 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> @@ -851,7 +867,11 @@ handle_buildid_r_match (int64_t b_mtime,
> > >return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - string popen_cmd = string("rpm2cpio " + shell_escape(b_source0));
> > > + string archive_decoder = "/dev/null";
Hi,
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 16:17 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Presenting testing for the debuginfod .deb/.ddeb support patch, after
> finding a good debian-packaging tutorial, and generating a workable
> basic set of test deb's on a Ubuntu box.
According to Matthias on irc there should be no d
Hi -
Thanks for the review!
> I looked at some distros, but the only ones that provide consistent
> debug[info] packages do so in rpm or deb format.
Yeah.
> What is the difference between a .deb and a .ddeb file/archive?
AIUI, .ddeb = debugging .deb ... although the "-dbgsym" substring
already
Hi Frank,
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 17:54 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> If anyone knows of a distro or ISV who is using standard .zip or .tar
> or somesuch archive formats as their distribution mechanism, it would
> be a tiny effort more to add another option, say "-A" (any archive),
> because liba
Hi -
Presenting testing for the debuginfod .deb/.ddeb support patch, after
finding a good debian-packaging tutorial, and generating a workable
basic set of test deb's on a Ubuntu box.
This patch is also on the elfutils.git fche/debuginfod-deb branch. In
the absence of objections, I plan to merge
Hi Kurt and Matthias,
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 17:54 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> On second thought, generalized the code & terminology. This may be
> ready for merging, except that it'd be awesome if a
> debian/ubuntu-literate person could create some test .deb/.ddeb files
> matching the tests/
