Hi Frank, Hi Victor,
On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 13:17 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > What about the grooming/scanning cycles?
> >
> > I was thinking the same thing. This patch series takes care of the web-
> > socket activation part. systemd also provides path-based activation of
> > units [1].
Hi -
> But I'm not sure a web-api-only functionality makes much sense -
> unless there is also a sibling debuginfod to do the scanning/grooming,
> in which case ... how does this help?
Another angle to consider: metrics/monitoring. The code goes to some
effort to let an operator know how the sys
Hi -
> > What about the grooming/scanning cycles?
>
> I was thinking the same thing. This patch series takes care of the web-
> socket activation part. systemd also provides path-based activation of
> units [1]. That could maybe be used for the scanning cycles. systemd
> would then trigger activa
Hi,
On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 09:54 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> As a developer I have a few self-built Debian packages in a small
> > repo
> > on my own laptop. I like having debuginfod running when debugging them,
> > but it does not have to be running all the time.
>
> What
Hi -
> As a developer I have a few self-built Debian packages in a small repo
> on my own laptop. I like having debuginfod running when debugging them,
> but it does not have to be running all the time.
What about the grooming/scanning cycles?
> This patch series is a first try at integrating sy
