Hi Martin,
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 14:31 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> > What do the test results look like? Do they all PASS with -ffat-
> > lto-objects?
> >
> > Could you try the proposed patch for
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27367
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfut
On 11/9/21 14:31, Martin Liška wrote:
Correct, I'm not using:
s/not/now
On 11/9/21 12:45, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 10:04 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/9/21 09:58, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Yes, but those who build elfutils with -flto are likely using
-ffat-lto-objects if they build static libraries.
Yes, I can confirm that we do that
Hi Martin,
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 10:04 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/9/21 09:58, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Yes, but those who build elfutils with -flto are likely using
> > -ffat-lto-objects if they build static libraries.
>
> Yes, I can confirm that we do that as openSUSE, we actually buil
On 11/9/21 10:09, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/9/21 09:58, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Yes, but those who build elfutils with -flto are likely using
-ffat-lto-objects if they build static libraries.
Yes, I can confirm that we do that as
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/9/21 09:58, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Yes, but those who build elfutils with -flto are likely using
> > -ffat-lto-objects if they build static libraries.
>
> Yes, I can confirm that we do that as openSUSE, we actually build wit
On 11/9/21 09:58, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Yes, but those who build elfutils with -flto are likely using
-ffat-lto-objects if they build static libraries.
Yes, I can confirm that we do that as openSUSE, we actually build with:
-flto -flto-partition=none -Wno-error=stack-usage= -ffat-lto-objects
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:18:31AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 01:02:28PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > Thanks. This patch was indeed one reason I kept postponing the release,
> > > because I didn't have have time to properly review it.
> >
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 01:02:28PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Thanks. This patch was indeed one reason I kept postponing the release,
> > because I didn't have have time to properly review it.
> >
> > Which gcc versions have you tried this against (with/without -flto?)
>
> I te
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 01:12:29PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 14:23 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:31:43PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:38:56AM +0100, Alexander Miller via
> > > Elfuti
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 14:23 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:31:43PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:38:56AM +0100, Alexander Miller via
> > Elfutils-devel wrote:
> > > From: Alexander Miller
> > >
> > > Use symver attribute for s
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:31:43PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:38:56AM +0100, Alexander Miller via Elfutils-devel
> wrote:
> > From: Alexander Miller
> >
> > Use symver attribute for symbol versioning instead of .symver
> > assembler directive when available. Conve
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:38:56AM +0100, Alexander Miller via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> From: Alexander Miller
>
> Use symver attribute for symbol versioning instead of .symver
> assembler directive when available. Convert to use double @ syntax
> for default version in all cases (required when u
13 matches
Mail list logo
