Hi,
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 20:00 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I think we cannot use the atomic_load () function, but have to use
> atomic_load_explicit. So it would become:
>
> diff --git a/libdw/dwarf_end.c b/libdw/dwarf_end.c
> index fc573cb3..a2e94436 100644
> --- a/libdw/dwarf_end.c
> +++ b/l
Hi,
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 11:28 -0500, Jonathon Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 18:13, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Does that look reasonable?
>
> It does, although I would prefer:
>
> diff --git a/libdw/dwarf_end.c b/libdw/dwarf_end.c
> index 9ca17212..6da9e0cd 100644
> --- a/libdw/dwarf
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 18:13, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
Finally back to this patch series.
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 15:16 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
diff --git a/libdw/dwarf_end.c b/libdw/dwarf_end.c
index 29795c10..fc573cb3 100644
--- a/libdw/dwarf_end.c
+++ b/libdw/dwarf_end.c
@@ -94,
Hi,
Finally back to this patch series.
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 15:16 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> diff --git a/libdw/dwarf_end.c b/libdw/dwarf_end.c
> index 29795c10..fc573cb3 100644
> --- a/libdw/dwarf_end.c
> +++ b/libdw/dwarf_end.c
> @@ -94,14 +94,15 @@ dwarf_end (Dwarf *dwarf)
>/* And
