On 5/12/21 12:01 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Sorry it missed the 0.184 release.
Thanks. Don't worry, it's a NOP, nothing urgent.
Martin
Hi Martin,
On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 15:26 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/1/21 12:13 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Yes, it is. It looks good and makes the code simpler to read.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Is it OK to add your Signed-off-by before I push it?
>
> Yes, please do it and push it.
Pushed as:
c
On 5/1/21 12:13 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Yes, it is. It looks good and makes the code simpler to read.
Thanks.
Is it OK to add your Signed-off-by before I push it?
Yes, please do it and push it.
Martin
Hi Martin,
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 09:13 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Is the patch ready to be installed?
Yes, it is. It looks good and makes the code simpler to read.
Is it OK to add your Signed-off-by before I push it?
See
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=elfutils.git;a=blob_plain;f=CONTRIBUTING;hb
On 4/20/21 1:43 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 15:18 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> I made similar changes to binutils some time ago and I would like to
>> come up with the same function for elfutils. Note that current
>> construct
>> is quite error prone, I found f
Em 20/04/2021 08:43, Mark Wielaard escreveu:
Hi Martin,
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 15:18 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
I made similar changes to binutils some time ago and I would like to
come up with the same function for elfutils. Note that current
construct
is quite error prone, I found for insta
Hi Martin,
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 15:18 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> I made similar changes to binutils some time ago and I would like to
> come up with the same function for elfutils. Note that current
> construct
> is quite error prone, I found for instance these 2 bad usages:
>
> diff --git a/l
