Hi,
On Wednesday, January 29th, 2025 at 2:40 PM, Mark Wielaard
wrote:
> I definitely like this patch. But when doing an autoreconf -f -v -i
> (autoconf 2.27) I get:
>
> autoheader: warning: missing template: HAVE_ERROR_H
> autoheader: warning: Use AC_DEFINE([HAVE_ERROR_H], [], [Description])
>
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:57:37AM +, parona wrote:
> On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at 10:40 PM, Mark Wielaard
> wrote:
> > So maybe our configure check is wrong and it should just test whether
> > there is an error.h but also if you can link the result?
>
> Included patch that checks i
Hi,
On Monday, January 27th, 2025 at 10:40 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> My main question/confusion is where the error.h include comes from.
> elfutils does support libcs like musl who don't provide error.h but do
> provide err.h. Then the build should provide its own error function
> through lib/sy
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 05:23:15AM +, parona wrote:
> Background for this patch is https://bugs.gentoo.org/948878 where
> are user had installed a standalone error implementation for a
> different package leading to a build failure.
There is also some discussion in this elfutils bug:
http
