Hi Mark,
> But that doesn't really work if you use clang.
It kind of does because almost everybody who builds their projects with clang
sanitizers
turns off `z,defs` and `--no-undefined`. I agree it looks weird (and it's
probably weird) but
it's just how it has been done for I don't know how ma
Hi Evgeny,
On Sun, 2021-12-05 at 19:52 +0300, Evgeny Vereshchagin wrote:
> > See how I used it to workaround isssues with the
> > gcc address sanitizer. You can use it likewise to work around
> > issues
> > with clang. e.g. the configure check should detect the issue with
> > --no-undefined and co
Hi Mark,
> But it would help if you replied to the original
> reviews and/or mentioned how the different versions of your patch have
> changed since the last time.
I did but it looks like those emails didn't pass the spam filter. I'll try to
figure out what happened there. Sorry about that!
>
Hi Evgeny,
I really appreciate you helping us using more analyzers and fuzzers to
improve the code base. I think the address sanitizer already helped
improve the code. But it would help if you replied to the original
reviews and/or mentioned how the different versions of your patch have
changed si
ASan, UBSan and MSan provided by clang aren't compatible with --no-undefined
and -z,defs:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#usage
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/380
so to build elfutils with clang with the sanitizers it should be possible
to turn them off.
It's implem
