Re: [PATCH v2] backends/ppc_initreg.c: include .

2021-02-05 Thread Érico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel
Em 05/02/2021 12:06, Mark Wielaard escreveu: Hi, On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 06:22 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: Said that, I think it's safe to include right before on powerpc since in glibc the latter includes the former. So that would move the include after the include. Érico, would that

Re: [PATCH v2] backends/ppc_initreg.c: include .

2021-02-05 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 06:22 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Said that, I think it's safe to include right before > on powerpc since in glibc the latter includes the former. So that would move the include after the include. Érico, would that work in your case? Thanks, Mark

Re: [PATCH v2] backends/ppc_initreg.c: include .

2021-02-01 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:04:03AM -0300, Érico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel wrote: > From: Érico Rolim > > Necessary on musl for struct pt_regs definition, doesn't affect the > build on glibc. > > Signed-off-by: Érico Rolim > --- > > Sending a v2 with the main difference being a slightly diff

[PATCH v2] backends/ppc_initreg.c: include .

2021-02-01 Thread Érico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel
From: Érico Rolim Necessary on musl for struct pt_regs definition, doesn't affect the build on glibc. Signed-off-by: Érico Rolim --- Sending a v2 with the main difference being a slightly different commit message and signed-off-by line. I'm a bit hesitant on this being the correct patch, so I