On 04/24/2017 04:53 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I got these separately. I assume they are as in the email you sent on
> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:48:06 +0200 (which didn't hit the list because it
> had the binaries attached...)
Yes. Those are the right binaries.
> This description doesn't seem to match
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 14:41 +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> diff --git a/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.core.bz2
> b/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.core.bz2
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..ef628af
> Binary files /dev/null and b/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.core.bz2 differ
> diff --git a/tests/backtrace.
If we don't find any debug information for a given frame, we usually
cannot unwind any further. However, the binary in question might have
been compiled with frame pointers, in which case we can look up the
well known frame pointer locations in the stack snapshot and use them
to bridge the frames w
