Hi,
On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 17:34 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> The main downside of the previous change to build in all libebl backend
> modules statically is that the total installed size of elfutils
> increased (from 2.1 MB to 3.5 MB in my case). This is because we have to
> statically link libeb
From: Omar Sandoval
The main downside of the previous change to build in all libebl backend
modules statically is that the total installed size of elfutils
increased (from 2.1 MB to 3.5 MB in my case). This is because we have to
statically link libebl and its backends into every binary. Instead,
